LIBRARY 


University  of  California. 


GIFT    OF 


'Cdbu^.  h^Jr...^^^    QhM 


Class 


>'^' 


ADDRESS 


UPON   THE 


CONDITION   OF  ARTICULATION  TEACHING  IN 
AMERICAN   SCHOOLS   FOR  THE   DEAF, 


ALEXANDER   GRAHAM  BELL, 

PRESIDENT   OF   THE   AMERICAN   ASSOCIATION   TO    PROMOTE 
THE    TEACHING    OF    SPEECH    TO    THE    DEAF. 


DELIVERED    JUNE    29,    1892, 

AT  THE  Opening  of  the  Second  Summer  Meeting  of  the  Association, 

HELD  at  Crosbyside  Hotel,  Lake  George,  N.Y., 

June  29  to  July  8,  1892. 


BOSTON: 

NATHAN   SAWYER  ^   SON,   PRINTERS, 

1893. 


ADDRESS 


UPON   THE 


CONDITION   OF   ARTICULATION   TEACHING   IN 
AMERICAN    SCHOOLS    FOR   THE    DEAF, 


ALEXANDER   GRAHAM   BELL, 

PRESIDENT   OF   THE   AMERICAN   ASSOCIATION   TO   PROMOTE 
THE   TEACHING   OF   SPEECH   TO   THE   DEAF. 


DELIVERED    JUNE    2' 


AT  THE  Opening  of  the  Second   Summer  Meeting  of  the  Association, 

HELD  AT  Crosbyside  Hotel,  Lake  George,  N.Y., 

June  29  to  July  8,  1892. 


COMPLIMENTS    OF 

ALEXANDER    GRAHAM   BELL, 

I 33 J  Connecticut  A  venue, 
Washington  D.C. 


.^|K»«f?-i:  -vr. 


ADDRESS 


UPON   THE 


CONDITION   OF   ARTICULATION   TEACHING    IN 
AMERICAN    SCHOOLS    FOR   THE   DEAF, 


ALEXANDER   GRAHAM   BELL, 

PRESIDENT   OF   THE   AMERICAN   ASSOCIATION   TO   PROMOTE 
THE   TEACHING   OF   SPEECH   TO   THE   DEAF. 


OF  THE 

UNIVERSITY 

^  OF 

DELIVERED    JUNE 

AT  THE  Opening  of  the  Second   Summer  Meeting  of  the  Association, 

HELD  AT  Crosbyside  Hotel,  Lake  George,  N.Y., 

June  29  to  July  8,   1892. 


BOSTON: 

NATHAN  SAWYER  &  SON,  PRINTERS, 

1893. 


HVa^^ 


M' 


TABLE    OF    CONTENTS. 


FAGB 

Index  to  Percentage  Charts  ........  4 

Index  to  Tables  of  Statistics         ........  4 

Address  ..............  5 

Tables,   showing    summary    of    results    given    in    detail   in   the 

appendix  ............  7 

Table,  showing   results  of  circular  letter  of  iNquiRY  sent  to 

American  Schools  for  the  Deaf 9 

Copy  of  circular  letter  of  inquiry,  and  blank  form  for  reply,         17 

Returns  received  in  reply  to  circular  letter  ....   1S-20 

Graphical  Charts,  showing  the  percentage  of  pupils  taught 
speech  in  American  Schools  for  the  Deaf,  for  the  years 
1884  TO  1891,  inclusive 23-46 

Tables  of  Statistics,  compiled  from  the  reports  of  the  schools 

AS    PUBLISHED    IN    "AMERICAN    AnNALS    OF    THE    DeAF,"  GIVING    THE 

figures  upon  which  are  based  the  percentages  shown  in  the 
Graphical  Charts .         .         .  49-72 


196095 


INDEX  TO   PERCENTAGE   CHARTS, 


SCHOOLS   FOR  THE   DEAF   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES. 


Alabama 

23 

Missouri 

32,  33 

Arkansas 

•     23 

Nebraska 

•     33 

California 

•     23 

New  Jersey 

•     34 

Colorado 

•     23 

New  Mexico    . 

•     34 

Connecticut    . 

.     24 

New  York 

34-36 

District  of  Columbia 

24.  25 

North  Carolina 

•     37 

Florida    .... 

•     25 

North  Dakota 

•    37 

Georgia  .... 

•     25 

Ohio         .... 

37.38 

Illinois     .... 

25,  26 

Oregon    .... 

•    39 

Indiana    .... 

26,  27 

Pennsylvania  , 

39.  40 

Iowa         .... 

•     27 

Rhode  Island  . 

.     40 

Kansas    .... 

27 

South  Carolina 

.     40 

Kentucky 

28 

South  Dakota 

•     41 

Louisiana 

28 

Tennessee 

.     41 

Maine      .... 

29 

Texas       .... 

•     41 

Marj'land 

29 

Utah         .... 

.     42 

Massachusetts 

30 

Virginia  .... 

.     42 

Michigan 

31 

Washington     . 

.     42 

Minnesota 

31 

West  Virginia 

.     42 

Mississippi 

32 

Wisconsin 

•       43.  44 

SCHOOLS 

FOR  THE 

DEAF   IN   CANADA. 

British  Columbia    . 

•     44 

Nova  Scotia     . 

•     45 

Manitoba 

■     44 

Ontario    .... 

•     45 

New  Brunswick 

•     45 

Province  of  Quebec 

■     46 

INDEX  TO   TABLES   OF   STATISTICS. 


SCHOOLS   FOR   THE   DEAF   IN  THE   UNITED   STATES. 


Alabama 

49 

Missouri 

58,  59 

Arkansas 

•     49 

Nebraska 

•     59 

California 

•     49 

New  Jersey 

.     60 

Colorado 

•     49 

New  Mexico    . 

.     60 

Connecticut     . 

■     50 

New  York 

60-62 

District  of  Columbia 

50,  51 

North  Carolina 

•     63 

Florida    . 

•     51 

North  Dakota 

■     63 

Georgia   . 

•     51 

Ohio         .... 

63,64 

Illinois 

51.  52 

Oregon    .... 

•     65 

Indiana    . 

52,  53 

Pennsylvania  . 

6:;,  66 

Iowa 

.     53 

Rhode  Island  . 

.^    66 

Kansas     . 

53 

South  Carolina 

.     66 

Kentucky 

54 

South  Dakota 

•     67 

Louisiana 

54 

Tennessee 

.     67 

Maine 

55 

Texas       .... 

•     67 

Maryland 

55 

Utah         .... 

.     68 

Massachusetts 

56 

Virginia  .... 

.     68 

Michigan 

57 

Washington     . 

.     68 

Minnesota 

57 

West  Virginia 

.     68 

Mississippi 

58 

Wisconsin 

69,70 

SCHOOLS   FOR   THE 

DEAF   IN   CANADA. 

British  Columbia    .         .         .         -70 

Nova  Scotia     . 

•     71 

Manitoba 70 

Ontario    .... 

•     71 

New  Brunswick 

•     71 

Province  of  Qiiebec 

.     72 

ADDRESS 


Ladies  and  Gentlemen  :  As  short  a  time  ago  as  the  year 
1890,  such  a  meeting  as  this  was  supposed  to  be  impossible. 
Teachers  of  the  deaf,  of  course,  have  met  in  conventions  before  ; 
but  they  have  been  entertained  at  the  expense  of  some  school  for 
the  deaf.  Teachers  of  the  deaf,  as  a  rule,  are  not  overburdened 
with  means,  and  it  was  supposed  to  be  impossible  to  bring  about 
any  large  gathering  of  this  kind  at  the  expense  of  the  teachers 
themselves. 

Well,  last  year  we  tried  the  experiment,  and  one  hundred 
and  fifty  teachers  of  the  deaf  assembled  at  Lake  George, — 
not  for  three  or  four  days,  as  had  been  the  case  in  conventions, 
but  for  ten  days,  —  and  paid  their  own  expenses.  Well,  that 
was  an  experiment,  and  it  was  thought  that  we  could  not  do 
that  again,  at  least  not  the  very  next  year ;  but  again  we  have 
come  together  in  increased  numbers,  full  of  energy  and  enthu- 
siasm for  our  work.  On  behalf  of  the  board  of  directors,  I 
may  say  that  we  accept  this  large  gathering  as  an  endorsement 
of  the  value  of  the  work  that  was  accomplished  during  the  last 
meeting.  We  accept  it  as  a  proof  that  you  have  been  satisfied, 
and  that  the  teachers  who  came  here  last  year  from  far  and 
wade,  at  considerable  expense  and  inconvenience  to  themselves, 
have  profited  by  what  they  found  here,  to  such  an  extent  that 
they  are  willing  to  incur  all  this  expense  and  trouble  again,  in 
the  belief  that  they  will  be  amply  repaid,  and  return  to  their 
schools  better  equipped  for  their  work. 

I  need  hardly  say  that  the  board  of  directors  are  highly  grati- 
fied by  this  mark  of  your  confidence,  and  we  trust  that  you  will 
all  go  away  from  Lake  George  with  the  feeling  that  you  have 
received  still  more  that  is  of  value  and  help  to  you  in  your  noble 
work,  and  that  you  will  all  feel  that  it  has  paid  you  to  come. 

Upon  this  occasion  it  would  be  a  proper  thing  for  me  to  say 
a  few  words  regarding  the  object  of  our  Association,  what  we 
have  accomplished  during  the  past  year,  and  what  we  aim  to  do 
in  the  future.     However,  that  subject  will  come  up  in  our  meeting 


this  evening,  and  it  will  hardly,  therefore,  be  necessary  for  me 
this  morning  to  do  more  than  direct  your  attention  to  the  object 
that  brings  us  together,  — to  the  great  end  and  aim  of  our  exist- 
ence as  an  Association,  —  and  to  give  you  some  report  of  the  prog- 
ress of  articulation  teaching  in  America  since  our  last  meeting. 

For  a  great  many  years  past,  the  advocates  of  the  different 
methods  of  educating  the  deaf  have  been  in  generous  rivalry 
with  one  another ;  and  in  our  conventions  we  have  discussed 
very  fully  the  relative  m.erits  of  the  different  methods  of  instruc- 
tion. Into  the  contest  between  the  different  methods  of  instruc- 
tion we  don't  propose  to  go.  We  are  an  entirely  neutral  body. 
In  1886,  at  the  California  convention,  a  resolution  was  unani- 
mously adopted  by  the  entire  profession,  including  teachers  who 
were  violently  opposed  to  one  another  upon  other  subjects.  It 
w^as  in  effect  that  every  deaf  child  should  be  given  a  chance 
to  learn  to  speak.  It  was  in  effect  that  earnest  and  persistent 
endeavors  should  be  made  in  every  school  for  the  deaf,  to  teach 
every  child  to  speak  and  read  from  the  lips.  That  is  the  plat- 
form upon  which  we  stand.  We  have  come  into  existence  as 
an  organization,  not  to  antagonize  any  school  or  system  of 
schools,  but  to  help  schools  of  all  sorts  in  America  to  carry  out 
the  spirit  and  purport  of  that  resolution. 

REPORT    ON    ARTICULATION    TEACHING    IN    AMERICA. 

I  have  made  a  close  examination  of  the  statistics  of  articula- 
tion teaching  in  order  to  ascertain  how  far  that  resolution  has 
been  carried  into  effect.  Great  progress  is  manifest  since  our 
last  Summer  Meeting  ;  but  though  a  great  increase  has  taken 
place  in  the  number  of  articulation  teachers  employed,  and  in 
the  number  of  deaf  pupils  taught  articulation,  still  the  majority 
of  our  pupils  have  not  yet  been  given  an  opportunity  of  learning 
to  speak.  I  beg  to  place  in  your  hands  a  detailed  analysis  of  the 
statistics  of  speech-teaching  in  American  schools  for  the  deaf, 
which  I  have  compiled  from  the  American  Annals  of  the  Deaf 
for  your  information  [See  Appendix] .  The  statistics  concerning 
articulation  teaching  extend  back  only  as  far  as  the  year  1884. 

The  tables  I  have  placed  in  your  hands  will  show  you  the 
total  number  of  pupils  in  ej^ch  school  for  the  deaf  in  the  United 


States  and  the  Dominion  of  Canada,  and  the  total  number  of 

pupils  taught  speech  in  each  year  from  1884  up  to  the  present 

time.     From  these  figures  I  have  calculated  the  percentage  of 

pupils  taught  speech  in  each  school  for  the  deaf;  and  the  results 

are  shown  graphically  in  the  charts  placed  in  your  hands.     The 

tables  also  include  the   total   number  of  teachers  employed  in 

each  school  for  the  deaf,  and  the  total  number  of  these  who  are 

engaged  in  teaching  articulation. 

The  following  Tables  give  a  summary  of  the  results  shown 

in  detail  in  the  Appendix.     They  exhibit  the  general  statistics 

of  articulation    teaching    in  the    United  States  up  to  January, 

1892  :  — 

TABLE   I. 

Statistics  Computed  from  the  American  Annals  of  the  Deaf. 


1 

PERCENTAGE   OF 

INSTRUCTORS   OF   THE    DEAF   EM-     I 

HEARING 

TEACHERS. 

HEARING 

PLOYED  IN  AMERICAN  SCHOOLS. 

TEACHERS. 

DATE. 

u 

i 

u 

C 
.0 

u 

4) 

c 

1  S 

<j 

0 

1^ 

'u 

3f^ 

*X3 

«1 

5h 

« 

u 

0 

H 

p 

s 

< 

)^ 

< 

^ 

1884 

;;oS 

^SS 

353 

_ 

_ 

_ 

iSSs 

540 

156 

384 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1886 

566 

158 

408 

134 

274 

32.8 

67.2 

1887 

577 

155 

422 

171 

251 

'       405 

59-5 

1888 

606 

154 

452 

199 

253 

44.0 

56.0 

1889 

615 

160 

455 

208 

247 

45-7 

54-3 

1890 

641 

170 

471 

213 

258 

45-2 

54-8 

1 89 1 

686 

167 

519 

260 

259 

50.0 

50.0 

TABLE   II. 

Statistics  Compiled  from  the  American  Annals  of  the  Deaf. 


DATE. 

NUMBER   OF   PUPILS   IN   AMERICAN   SCHOOLS 
FOR   THE    DEAF. 

PERCENTAGE  OF  PUPILS   IN 

AMERICAN   SCHOOLS 

FOR   THE   DEAF. 

Total  Pupils. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Not  Taught 
Speech. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Not  Taught 
Speech. 

1884 
188'J 
1886 
1887 
1S88 
1889 
1890 
189I 

7,482 
7,801 

8,0!;o 
7,978 
8,372 
8,575 
8,901 

9,232 

2,041 
2,618 
2,484 
2,556 
3,251 
3,412 
3,682 

4,245 

5,441 

5,566 
5,422 
5,121 
5,163 
5,219 
4,987 

27.2 

33-5 
30.8 
32.0 
38.8 
39-7 
41-3 
46.0 

69.1 
67.9 
61. 1 
60.2 
58.6 

54-0 

8 

The  total  number  of  teachers  of  the  deaf  employed  in  the 
United  States  in  1890  was  641,  and  in  1891,  686.  This  is  an 
increase  of  45.  When  we  come  to  analyze  the  details  we  find 
that  this  is  an  increase  exclusively  of  articulation  teachers. 
This  is  shown  by  the  following  facts:  In  1890  there  were  213 
articulation  teachers  employed,  whereas  in  1S91  there  were 
260,  —  an  increase  of  47  articulation  teachers.  The  first 
statistics  upon  this  subject  were  collected  by  the  Annals  in  1886. 
In  that  year  we  find  articulation  teachers  constituted  32.8  per 
cent,  of  the  hearing  teachers  in  our  schools  for  the  deaf;  in 
1887  they  constituted  40.5  per  cent.  ;  in  1888,  44  per  cent.  ;  in 
1889,  45.7  per  cent.;  in  1890,  45.2  per  cent.;  in  1891,  the 
latest  returns,  50  per  cent.  Indeed,  they  constituted  one  more 
than  50  per  cent.  There  were  260  articulation  teachers  to  259 
hearing  teachers  who  were  not  engaged  in  articulation  work. 

In  regard  to  the  proportion  of  deaf  pupils  taught  speech,  the 
increase  during  the  past  year  has  been  very  marked.  In  1890 
there  were  3,682  deaf'  children  in  the  United  States  taught 
speech;  in  1891,  4,245,  an  increase  of  563.  In  1890,  41.3  per 
cent,  of  our  pupils  were  taught  speech;  in  1891,  46  per  cent. 
I  am  sure  that  this  increase  is  due  very  gready  to  the  sdmulus 
of  the  first  Summer  Meeting  of  this  Association. 

The  following  diagram  illustrates  in  a  graphical  manner  the 
percentage  of  pupils  taught  speech  in  American  schools  for  the 
deaf  since  the  year  1884,  when  statistics  upon  the  subject  were 
first  collected  by  the  Annals  :  — 

Percentage  of  Pupils  taught  Speech. 


1884.  27- 

1885.  33- 
18S6.  31- 

1887.  32 

1888.  39 
1S89.  40 
1890.  41- 
i8qi.  46 


Taught  Speeci-  ■  ^ot  Taught  Speech. 


No  attempts  to  teach  speech  have  been  made  to  the  percent- 
age of  pupils  shown  by  the  black  lines  on  the  right-hand  side 
of  the  diagram  ;  and,  unfortunately,  these  pupils  still  constitute 


the  majority  of  the  whole.  There  is  still  work,  therefore,  for  this 
Association  to  do,  for  no  attempt  has  yet  been  made  to  teach 
speech  to  54  per  cent,  of  our  pupils.  Of  course,  the  statistics 
in  the  Annals  include  the  whole  of  our  pupils,  old  as  well  as 
young  ;  and  it  has  occurred  to  me,  therefore,  that  they  may  not 
trive  us  a  true  indication  of  the  extent  to  which  the  California 
Resolution  is  being  carried  out  in  the  country  at  large,  and  that 
a  better  indication  would  be  obtained  by  statistics  concerning 
younger  pupils  alone.  I  therefore  sent  out  a  circular  letter  of 
inquiry  to  the  superintendents  and  principals  of  American 
schools  for  the  deaf,  requesting,  — 

(i)  The  total  number  of    new  pupils    admitted  during    the 
school  year  just  closed  ; 

(2)  The  number  of  new  pupils  taught  speech  ;  and 

(3)  The  number  of  these  taught  by  speech. 

The  following  table  shows  the  results  of  the  inquiry  :  — 
Speech-teaching  in  American  Schools  for  the  Deaf,   1891. 


No.  of  Pupils  within  the 
yeariSgi.     FFroin  the 
Annals  for  Jan.  1S92.] 

New  Pupils  admitted  during  the  school- 
year  ending  June,  1892.     [From  replies 
to  circular  letter  of  A.  G.  Bell.J 

Schools  for  the  Deaf. 

^^^  !  h-.^ 

ill 

0   bJDu 

Percentage. 

m 

Percent 
Taugl 
Speec 

h    ,c/3 

(A  .  . 
United  States,-^  B  .   . 

Ic  .  . 

5.614 

1,619 
I '999 

2,960 

759 
536 

53 
47 

27 

836 

580 
189 

363 

69 
71 

43 

Total, 

9.232 

4.255 

46 

1,102 

769 

70 

- 

TA  .   . 
Canada,    .     .     J  B  .  . 

Ic  .  . 

445 

309 

39 

92 
132 

5 

21 
43 
13 

59 

20 
41 

5 

35 

'1 

8 

_ 

Total,       j      793 

229    29 

122 

61 

- 

50 

- 

A.  Complete  returns  were  received  from  these  schools. 

B.  The  returns  received  from  these  schools  did  not  state  definitely  the  number  of  new  pupils 

taught  by  speech.  (See  Table  in  the  Appendix.)  The  Canadian  schools  marked  "B" 
refer  to  the  two  Roman  Catholic  schools  in  Montreal.  They  return  126  pupils,  or  41  per 
cent,  of  the  whole,  as  taught  by  speech ;  but  do  not  state  how  many  of  the  new  pupils  were 
so  taught. 

C.  These  schools  did  not  reply  to  the  circular  letter  of  inquiry. 


lO 

Replies  have  been  received  from  schools  containing  7,987 
pupils,  or  80  per  cent,  of  the  v\  hole  number  under  instruction 
in  tlie  United  States  and  Canada.  It  is  encouraging  to  note 
that  while  46  per  cent,  of  the  whole  number  in  our  schools  last 
year  were  taught  articulation,  70  per  cent,  of  the  younger  pupils 
were  afforded  an  opportunity  of  learning  to  speak.  The  sta- 
tistics published  in  the  Annals  are  somewhat  defective,  because, 
while  they  give  us  the  total  number  of  pupils  taught  speech, 
they  do  not  give  us  the  number  taught  by  speech ;  so  that  we 
have  no  statistics  by  which  we  can  measure  the  progress  of  the 
oral  method  of  teaching  in  America. 

Professor  Joseph  C.  Gordon  of  the  National  Deaf-Mute 
College,  in  some  editorial  remarks  prefacing  a  volume  entitled 
"  The  Education  of  the  Deaf,"  about  to  be  issued  by  the  Volta 
Bureau,  says:  ''The  returns  of  pupils  taught  dy  speech  are 
incomplete.  The  number  reported  for  1891  is  963,  or  10.4  per 
cent,  of  the  school  population."  The  above  table  indicates  that 
the  percentage,  in  the  case  of  the  younger  pupils,  must  be  very 
much  larger.  Out  of  836  new  pupils  admitted  during  the  past 
school-year,  363,  or  43  per  cent.,  were  taught  by  speech. 

This  percentage,  however,  is  probably  excessive,  because  the 
table  shows  that  those  schools  w^hich  have  done  the  most  work 
in  articulation  teaching  have  been  the  most  ready  to  respond  to 
inquiries  relating  to  the  subject.  We  cannot,  therefore,  assume 
that  the  percentage  holds  for  the  schools  that  have  not  replied 
to  my  circular  letter. 

Still,  even  if  we  assume  that  these  363  deaf  children  were  all 
who  were  taught  by  the  oral  method,  the  percentage  must  be 
very  much  higher  than  that  given  by  Professor  Gordon.  This 
will  be  obvious  from  the  following  considerations  ;  — 

The  schools  containing  these  cases  had  a  total  attendance  of 
5,614  pupils,  of  whom  836,  or  15  per  cent.,  were  new  pupils 
admitted  during  the  past  school-year. 

If  this  proportion  held  good  for  the  whole  country,  then 
there  must  have  been  a  total  of  1,385  new  pupils, — or  15  per 
cent,  of  9,232,  —  admitted  during  the  year  just  closed. 

Now  363  of  these,  at  least  —  or  26  per  cent.  —  we  know 
were    taught   by  speech.      Hence,  for    the    younger  pupils  the 


II 

true  proportion  taught  by  speech  lies  somewhere  between  26  and 
43  per  cent,  of  the  whole.  The  lowest  estimate  very  much 
exceeds  the  figures  of  Professor  Gordon. 

We  have  no  means  of  ascertaining  whether  the  proportion  of 
our  pupils  taught  by  speech  is  increasing  or  diminishing ;  and 
I  think  it  would  be  well  for  this  Association  to  direct  the  atten- 
tion of  the  editor  of  the  Annals  to  the  importance  of  collecting 
and  publishing  statistics  upon  this  subject. 

I  have  glanced  over  the  reports  of  American  schools  for  the 
deaf  that  have  been  published  since  our  last  meeting,  and  there 
are  a  few  points  contained  in  them  to  which  I  shall  direct  your 
attention. 

In  the  Twelfth  Biennial  Report  of  the  American  Asylum  at 
Hartford,  the  principal,  Dr.  Job  Williams,  gives  his  view^s  upon 
what  constitutes  success  in  articulation  work.     He  says,  — 

"We  hold  that  direct  and  earnest  effort  should  be 
made  by  expert  teachers  of  those  branches,  to  teach  speech 
and  speech-reading  to  every  pupil,  and  in  no  case  should 
that  effort  be  abandoned  until  those  teachers  are  convinced 
that  the  pupil  will  never  acquire  enough  of  speech  to  be 
of  any  practical  use.  In  some  very  unpromising  cases  the 
possibility  of  acquiring  speech  is  not  given  up  for  two  or 
three  years.  Here  let  me  say  that  the  criterion  of  success 
in  speech  should  not  he  perfect  naturalness  of  tone  and 
inflection.  It  would  be  imreasonable  to  expect  that,  where 
the  sense  of  hearing  is  wanting.  Intelligibility  is  the 
prime  requisite  of  good  speech.  Tone  and  inflection  are 
secondary  considerations.  Any  fupil  who  has  mastered 
speech  and  lip-reading  so  far  as  to  be  able  to  carry  on 
conversation  in  regard  to  the  ordinary  affairs  of  life 
ifi  speech  so  plain  as  to  be  readily  understood  by  the 
members  of  his  own  family^  even  though  others  fail  to 
understand  him^  should  be  counted  as  a  successful 
articulator  and  lip-reader.  It  is  worth  while  to  continue 
the  instruction  in  these  branches  in  many  cases  where  the 
degree  of  success  falls  considerably  short  of  the  ability  to 
carry  on  an  extended  conversation,  provided  that  what  of 
speech  is  acquired  is  easily  understood.  We  must  recog- 
nize the  fact  that  intelligible  speech  is  the  readiest  and  most 


12 

acceptable  means  of  communication  with  people  in  gen- 
eral, but  it  must  be  intelligible.  It  is  worth  while  for  a 
child  to  gain  even  a  limited  amount  of  speech  and  lip- 
reading  (the  latter  is  as  important  as  the  former)  in  all 
cases  where  it  can  be  done  without  serious  sacrifice  in 
mental  development  and  acquisition  of  language." 

We  must  all  agree  w^ith  Mr.  Williams  in  these  remarks.  We 
should,  of  course,  aim  to  have  our  pupils  speak  so  clearly  and 
distinctly  that  any  one  can  understand  them  ;  but  I  am  sure  Mr. 
Williams  is  right  in  saying  that  a  much  lower  degree  of  pro- 
ficiency might  constitute  a  pupil  a  successful  articulator  and 
speech-reader.  Mr.  Williams  rightly  claims  that  oral  instruc- 
tion is  successful  if  the  speech  of  pupils  is  intelligible  to  their 
friends  in  their  own  homes  and  among  their  own  people,  even 
though  others  have  difficulty  in  understanding  what  they  say. 
It  is  a  very  difficult  thing  for  a  teacher,  and  especially  for  an 
articulation  teacher,  to  realize  this.  I  have  been  myself  a 
teacher  of  articulation,  and  I  know  how  you  feel.  Your  ears 
are  sensitive  to  mispronunciations,  as  mine  were.  It  is  difficult 
for  you  to  realize  that  voices  which  to  you  may  be  disagree- 
able in  tone,  may  be  very  sweet  and  pleasant  to  those  at  home. 
It  is  difficult  for  you  to  realize  that  imperfect  speech  may  be 
better  than  none  at  all ;  and  that  speech  so  defective  as  to  be 
unintelligible  to  strangers,  may  be  of  the  greatest  value  to  the 
pupils,  in  their  own  homes  and  among  their  own  people,  as  a 
means  of  communication.  This  fact  has  been  specially 
impressed  upon  my  attention  by  the  report  of  the  Mississippi 
Institution,  which,  in  many  respects,  is  a  very  remarkable  docu- 
ment. That  Institution  has  had  a  class  of  twelve  pupils  taught 
altogether  by  speech  and  speech-reading.  While  all  of  them 
have  made  great  progress  in  speech-reading,  some  have  gained 
but  little  power  of  speech.     Mr.  Dobyns,  the  Principal,  says,  — 

"  While  I  have  been  more  than  satisfied  that  the  Insti- 
tution was  justifiable  in  the  small  outlay  in  this  depart- 
ment of  instruction,  yet,  for  fear  my  zeal  to  keep  pace  with 
the  times  may  have  gotten  the  better  of  my  judgment,  I 
submitted  the  following  questions  to  the  parents  of  the 
pupils  in  this  class,  knowing  they  desired  the  very  best 
thing  for  their  children." 


13 

I  will  not  take  up  your  time  by  reading  the  questions  and 
replies,  but  will  merely  say  that  the  answers  demonstrate  that 
speech  which  may  be  thought  very  little  of  by  the  sensitive  ear 
of  the  teacher,  is  considered  a  blessing  at  home.  None  of  these 
parents  desire  their  children  to  be  removed  from  the  oral 
department  of  the  school ;  but,  on  the  contrary,  they  all  ear- 
nestly request  that  their  children  be  continued  in  this  department. 
Where  there  is  any  difficulty  in  deciding  upon  the  value  and 
success  of  the  articulation  taught  to  our  pupils,  with  whom 
should  the  decision  rest  ?  Surely  with  those  who  are  nearest 
and  dearest  to  our  pupils,  —  with  those  who  have  their  interest 
most  at  heart.  Mr.  Dobyns,  I  am  sure,  is  right  in  referring  the 
question  to  the  parents  and  friends  at  home. 

In  this  report,  Mr.  Dobyns  incidentally  remarks  that  now, 
whenever  a  new  pupil  enters  the  Institution,  the  request  comes 
from  the  parents:  "Please  see  if  you  can't  teach  my  child  to 
speak."  He  has,  therefore,  asked  from  the  Mississippi  Legis- 
lature an  increase  of  appropriation  to  enable  him  to  employ 
another  articulation  teacher ;  and  I  am  sure  we  all  hope  he  may 
get  it. 

There  is  another  point  in  the  report  of  the  Mississippi  Institu- 
tion to  which  I  would  direct  your  attention.  Mr.  Dobyns  has 
collected  and  published  statistics  concerning  the  earnings  of 
former  pupils,  and  he  goes  to  his  State  Legislature  with  the 
proof  that  the  graduates  of  his  school,  so  far  from  being  depend- 
ent upon  the  public  for  support,  are  actually  wealth  producers, 
earning  annually  a  larger  amount  than  the  State  appropriates 
for  the  support  of  the  school.  He  proves  that  it  is  not  a  matter 
of  charity  to  educate  the  deaf,  and  demonstrates  that  the  money 
appropriated  for  this  purpose  is  in  the  nature  of  an  investment, 
yielding  profitable  returns  to  the  State. 

I  would  urge  all  schools  for  the  deaf  to  carry  out  this  plan  of 
Mr.  Dobyns,  and  collect  statistics  concerning  the  earnings  of 
former  pupils.  I  would  suggest  that  these  statistics  should  be 
so  tabulated  as  to  distinguish  the  earnings  of  the  pupils  who 
could  articulate  and  read  speech  from  the  mouth,  from  those 
who  could  not.  I  have  no  doubt  that  pupils  who  speak  have  an 
advantage  in  life  over  those  who  do  not,  and  that  statistics  will 


14 

demonstrate  that  their  average  earnings  exceed  the  average 
earnings  of  those  who  are  unable  to  articulate.  If  this  should 
turn  out  to  be  the  case,  what  an  argument  it  would  be  to  present 
to  legislatures  in  favor  of  appropriations  for  articulation 
teaching  ! 

One  of  our  main  objects  as  an  association  is  to  help  schools 
for  the  deaf  in  their  efforts  to  teach  speech  and  speech-reading, 
and  I  do  not  know  how  we  could  better  accomplish  that  object 
than  by  collecting  statistics  of  this  character.  I  venture  to  pre- 
dict, we  shall  find  that  our  former  pupils  who  speak,  even  though 
the}^  may  be  unable  to  read  speech,  earn  more  per  annum  than 
those  who  are  forced  to  resort  exclusively  to  manual  means  of 
communication ;  and  those  of  them  who  can  read  speech,  as 
well  as  speak,  are  still  better  off  in  life. 

Mr.  Davidson,  of  the  Pennsylvania  Institution,  has  suggested 
another  valuable  line  of  inquiry.  From  a  comparison  of 
numerous  letters  in  his  possession,  he  makes  the  assertion,  that 
orally-taught  pupils  improve  in  their  knowledge  and  use  of  lan- 
guage after  leaving  school.  I  would  suggest  the  importance  of 
preserving  uncorrected  letters  of  your  pupils  during  the  whole 
period  of  their  school-life,  and  of  keeping  up  correspondence 
with  them  after  they  leave  school.  A  comparison  of  letters, 
written  by  the  same  pupil  at  different  periods  of  time,  would  be 
invaluable  as  a  means  of  determining  his  progress  ;  and  the  cor- 
respondence in  adult  life  might  also  be  utilized  for  the  purpose 
of  collecting  statistics  concerning  the  earnings  and  general 
success  in  life  of  our  pupils. 

Alexander  Graham  Bell. 


APPENDIX 


17 


The  following  circular  letter  of  inquiry  was  sent  to  the  prin- 
cipal of  every  school  for  the  deaf  in  the  United  States  and 
Canada  :  — 

Hotp:l  Bellevue,  Boston,  Mass., 

May  1 6,  1S92. 

Dear  Sir  :  I  shall  be  very  much  obliged  if  you  will 
please  fill  out  the  accompanying  blank  table  concerning 
the  pupils  admitted  to  your  school  during  the  present 
year. 

I  desire  to  use  the  figures  in  my  annual  report  on  the 
condition  of  articulation  teaching  in  America,  which  is 
to  be  presented  very  soon  to  the  American  Association 
to  Promote  the  Teaching  of  Speech  to  the  Deaf.  Kindly 
send  an  early  reply  to 

Yours  truly, 

Alexander  Graham  Bell. 

The  blank  form  for  reph^  shown  below  was  enclosed  with  the 
above. 


1892. 


Mr.  Alexander  Graham  Bell, 
Hotel  Bellevue,  Boston,  Mass. 


Dear  Sir  :  In  reply  to  your  request,  I  beg  to  return 
the  following  statistics  relating  to  articulation  teaching  in 

the 

for  the  school-year  1891-92. 

I.      Total  number  of   new  pupils  admitted 

during  the  present  school-year  .  .      

3.     Total    number   of    new    pupils     taught 

speech       ......       

3.  Total  number  of  these  taught  by 
speech       ...... 

Yours  truly. 


i8 


In  response  to  the  above  circular  letter  of  inquiry  the  follow- 
ing returns  have  been  received  :  — 

Replies  to  Circular  Letter  Received  ix  June,   1892. 


NEW  PUPILS  ADMITTED 

DURING  SCHOOL-YEAR 

STATES    AND   TERRI- 

SCHOOLS     FOR    THE    DEAF    IN    THE 

ENDING  JUNE,    1S92. 

TORIES. 

UNITED     STATES. 

Total 

Taught 

Taught 

by 
Speech. 

Pupils. 

Speech. 

Alabama     .     .     .     . 

Alabama  Institute 

15 

7 

7 

Arkansas    .     . 

Arkansas  Institute"    .     .     . 

21 

14 

0 

California  .     . 

California  Institution       .     . 

_ 

_ 

Colorado     .     . 

Colorado  School     .... 

iS 

15 

10 1) 

Connecticut    . 

American  Asylum  .... 

35 

25^ 

0 

Connecticut    . 

. 

Whipple's  Home  School'^    . 

7 

7 

7 

District  of  Columbia 

Kendall  School 

13 

13 

-  e 

District  of  Columbia 

National  College     .... 

15 

15 

0 

Florida 

Florida  Institute      .... 

6 

5 

5 

Georgi.'i 

Georgia  Institution      .     .     . 

_ 

Illinois  .     . 

Illinois  Institution        .     .      . 

89 

89 

-/ 

Illinois  .     . 

Chicago  Day-Schools  . 

Illinois  .     . 

McCowen  Oral  School     .     . 

7-" 

7 

7 

Illinois  .     . 

Ephpheta  School     .... 

18 

17 

Indiana  .     . 

Indiana  Institution -^z    .      .     . 

35 

8 

0 

Indiana  .      . 

Evansville  School  .... 

Iowa .     .     . 

Iowa  Institution      .... 

- 

_ 

_ 

Iowa  .     .     . 

Eastern  Iowa  School  .     .      . 

— 

_ 

_ 

Kansas  ,     . 

Kansas  Institution       .     .     . 

36 

6 

-  / 

Kentucky    . 

Kentucky  Institute       .     .      . 

57 

24 

8 

Louisiana  . 

Louisiana  School    .... 

- 

Louisiana  . 

Chinchuba  Institution     .      . 

-J 

_ 

_ 

Maine     .     . 

Portland  Day-School  .     .      . 

2 

2 

2 

Maryland    . 

Maryland  School    .... 

7 

6 

3 

Maryland    . 

Maryland  School  for  Colored 

I 

0 

0 

Maryland    . 

Mr.  Knapp's  Institute      .     . 

_ 

_ 

_ 

Massachuse 

tts 

Clarke  Institution  .... 

1     -4 

24 

24 

Massachuse 

tts 

Horace  Mann  School -^^     .     . 

-5 

25 

25 

a  Arkansas  Institute.  "Not  taught  speech,  i,  malformation  of  organs  of  speech;  3  over 
twenty  years  of  age;  3  colored  pupils,  no  appropriations."  —  F.  D.  Clakke. 

b  Colorado  School.    "Aural." — John  E.  Ray. 

c  American  Asylum.  "  One  or  two  others,  who  for  special  reasons  were  not  put  into  articula- 
tion classes  this  year,  will  be  next." — Job  Williams. 

li  Whipple's  School.  "  There  are  no  signs  of  any  kind  taiight  in  our  school."  —  Makgaket 
Hammond. 

e  Kendall  School.  "  They  are  taught  partly  by  speech,  partly  by  other  methods." — James 
Denison, 

/Illinois  Institution.  "None  are  taught  exclusively  by  speech,  though  many  are  taught 
both  by  speech  and  signs  as  well  as  by  writing  and  dactylology." 

g  McCowEN  Oral  School.  "  Four  of  the  above  pupils  h:id  been  in  school  at  some  previous 
time,  here  or  elsewhere,  while  three  were  '  beginners,'  never  having  attended  any  school  before." 
—  Mary  McCowen. 

h  Indiana  Institution.  "Intend  to  start  a  class  next  year  which  will  be  instructed  aJto- 
gether  by  oral  method."  —  R.  O.  Johnson. 

i  Kansas  Institution.    "  None  solely."  —  S.  T.  Walker. 

j  Chinchuba  Institution.    "  Thirty-one  new  pupils  :  16  males,  15  females."  —  II.  Miquot. 

k  HoKACE  Mann  School.     "  Nine  pupils  had  speech  when  admitted."  — Sakah  Fuller. 


19 


STATES   AND   TERRI- 
TORIES. 


Massachusetts 
Massachusetts 
Michigan 
Michigan 
Minnesota 
Minnesota 
Mississippi 
Missouri 
Missouri 
Missouri 
Missouri 
Nebraska 
New  Jersey 
New  Mexico 
New  York  . 
New  York  . 
New  York  . 
New  York  . 
New  York  . 
New  York  . 
New  York  . 
New  York  . 
New  York  . 
North  Carolin 
North  Dakota 
Ohio.     .     . 
Ohio .     .     . 
Ohio .     .     . 
Ohio.     .     . 
Ohio.     .     . 
Oregon  . 
Pennsylvania 
Pennsylvania 
Pennsylvania 
Pennsvlvania 


SCHOOLS  FOR  THE  DEAF  IN  THE 
UNITED  STATES. 


New  England  Industrial  School     . 

Sarah  Fuller  Home 

Michigan  School 

German  Lutheran  Institute 

Minnesota  SchooK 

St.  Mary's  Institute 

Mississippi  Institution «        .     .      .     , 

Missouri  School 

St.  Louis  Day-School''    .... 
Maria  Consilia  Institute  .... 

Miss  Kugler's  School 

Nebraska  Institute       .... 

New  Jersey  School 

New  Mexico  School/ 

New  York  Institution  y    .... 
Le  Couteulx  St.  Mary's  Institution 
N.Y.Inst,  for  Improved  Instruction  ^ 

St.  Joseph's  Institute 

Central  N.  Y.  Institution     . 
Western  N.  Y.  Institution    ... 
Northern  N.  Y.  Institution  .     .      .     , 

Miss  Keeler's  Class 

Albany  Home  School       .... 
North  Carolina  Institution  .     .     .     , 

North  Dakota  School 

Ohio  Institution 

Cincinnati  Public  School     ... 

Cincinnati  Oral  School 

Toledo  School 

Notre  Dame  School 

Oregon  School   , 

Pennsylvania  Institution  .  .  .  , 
Western  Pennsylvania  Institution. 
Pennsylvania  Oral  School  .  .  .  . 
Home  for  Young  Deaf  Children     . 


NEW  PUPILS   ADMITTED 

DURING    SCHOOL-YEAR 

ENDING  JUNE,  1S92. 


'9 


Total 

Taua:ht 

TauL-^ht 

by 
Speech. 

Pupils. 

Speech. 

5 

3 

0 

--> 

3 

3 

41 

7 

4 

7 

7 

7 

36 

36 

0 

13 

13 

-  in 

50 

12 

4 

12 

12 

- 

II 

II 

0 

3 

3 

3 

18 

18 

18 

^3 

15 

^5 

0 

0 

0 

34 

34 

0 

17 

17 

:> 

24 

24 

-H 

42 

41 

41 

19 


64 

30 

30 

40 

23 

14 

3 

3 

3 

20 

20 

20 

/  Minnesota  School.  "A  thorough  trial  is  made  with  all  new  pupils.  Those  who  give  evi- 
dence of  success  in  speech  and  lip-reading  will  be  formed  into  an  oral  class  next  term.  Next  year 
we  shall  have  three  oral  teachers.  Nearly  half  of  the  school  receive  more  or  less  oral  instruction 
daily." — J.  L.  Noyes. 

m  St.  Mary's  Institute.    "  Fifty  taught  by  speech."  — Ernestine  Nardin. 

n  Mississippi  Institution.  "Eighty-five  pupils.  P'our  new  pupils  taught  speech;  4  taught 
by  speech."  — J.  R.Dobyns. 

o  St.  Louis  Day'-School.  "Twelve  new  pupils  enrolled  this  year;  i  remained  only  one  day; 
S  had  attended  other  schools,  'oral'  or  'combined,'  for  from  two  to  six  years.  All  are  taught 
speech;  none  are  taught  by  speech  exclusively." — J.  H.  Cloud. 

p  New  Mexico  School.  "  I  would  like  to  have  articulation  taught  to  some  mutes  who  are 
capable  of  learning  to  speak  here,  if  I  could  get  more  aid  from  the  Territory;  but  this  school  has 
received  a  very  small  part  of  the  appropriation  granted  to  the  school  for  its  support,  owing  to  poor 
and  careless  collections  in  the  general  tax  system  in  this  Territory."  —  Lars.  N.  Larson. 

q  New  York  Institution.  "  Of  the  310  pupils  under  instruction  during  the  year,  all  but  2 
were  taught  articulation  and  lip-reading,  and  10  were  taught  by  speech."  —  I.  L.  Peet,  C.  X. 
Brainard. 

r  New  York  Improved.  "  Total  number  of  pupils,  206.  All  taught  speech,  and  by  speech." 
—  D.  Greenberger. 

.V  North  Dakota  School.     "  Seven  taught  by  speech." —  A.  R.  Speak. 


20 


STATES    AND    TERRI- 
TORIES. 


Rhode  Island  . 
South  Carolina 
South  Dakota 
Tennessee  . 
Texas 
Texas     .     . 
Utah  .     .     . 
Virginia 
Washington 
West  Virginia 
Wisconsin  . 
Wisconsin  . 
Wisconsin  . 
Wisconsin  . 
Wisconsin  . 


SCHOOLS    FOR   THE    DEAF    IN    THE 
UNITED    STATES. 


Rhode  Island  School  . 
South  Carolina  Institution  . 

Dakota  School 

Tennessee  School  .... 

Texas  Asjlum 

Texas  Institution  for  Colored 

Utah  School 

Virginia  Institution     .     . 
Washington  State  School     . 
West  Virginia  School 
Wisconsin  School  .... 
Milwaukee  Daj-School    .     . 
La  Crosse  Day-School     . 
Wausau  Day-School    .     .     . 
St.  John's  Catholic  Institute 


NEW  PUPILS   ADMITTED 

DURING    SCHOOL-YEAR 

ENDING  JUNE,  1S92. 


Total 
Pupils. 


8 

14 

35 


II 

16 

22 

6 

3 


Taught 
Speech, 


Taught 

by 
Speech. 


-   / 


PROVINCES. 

SCHOOLS    FOR   THE    DEAF    IN   THE 
DOMINION    OF    CANADA. 

NEW  PUPILS  ADMITTED 

DURING   SCHOOL-YEAR 

ENDING  JUNE,    1892. 

Total 
Pupils. 

Taught  |Tau?ht 
Spe-^^l^- Spelch. 

Manitoba    .     . 
New  Brunswick 
Nova  Scotia    . 
Ontario  . 
Qiiebec  .     .     . 
Qiiebec  .     .      . 
Quebec  .     .     . 

Manitoba  Institution 

Fredericton  Institution 

Halifax  Institution 

Ontario  Institution" 

Catholic  Institution  for  Males  .     .     . 
Catholic    Institution     for    Females, 
Mackay  Institution 

6 

38 
20 

43 

2 

I 

12 

26 

5 

2 
0 
0 

-  7' 

-  W 

3 

t  South  Carolina  Institution.  '•  None  are  taught  *  by  speech '  exclusively."  —  N.  F. 
Walker. 

u  Ontario  Institution.  "  We  have  251  pupils  in  attendance.  Thirty-eight  new  pupils  were 
admitted  during  the  last  school-year.  Of  these  38,  12  were  put  incur  articulation  classes,  and  taught 
speech  three-quarters  of  an  hour  each  day.  In  these  articulation  classes  we  have  49  pupils  tauglit 
in  the  same  way.  There  are  no  pupils  in  our  Institution  taught  altogether  orally."  —  R.  Mathison. 

z' Catholic  Male  of  Province  of  Quebec  "Forty-seven  taught  by  speech." — J.  H. 
Manseau. 

w  Catholic  Female  of  Province  of  Quebec.  "Seventy-nine  taught  by  speech."  — Sr. 
Chs.  of  the  Prov. 


SPEECH-TEACHING    IN    AMERICAN 
SCHOOLS   FOR  THE   DEAF. 


STATISTICS   FROM   THE 
AMERICAN    ANNALS    OF   THE    DEAF/ 


COMPILED    BY 


ALEXANDER   GRAHAM   BELL. 


CHARTS   SHOWING   PERCENTAGES. 


ALABAMA. 
A-labama  Institute  for  tJie  Deaf,  Talladega,  Ala. 


1884. 

1885. 
1886. 

O 
20 
20 

1887. 
1888. 
1889. 
1890. 

17- 

22 
23 

1891. 

22 

Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Spebch. 


ARKANSAS. 
ArJeansas  Deaf-Mute  Institute,  little  Rock,  JLrk. 


1884.  31 

1885.  70 

1886.  33 

1887.  28 

1888.  24 
18S9.  23 

1890.  20 

1891.  20 


Taught  Speech.    I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


CALIFORNIA. 

California  Institution  for  the  Education  of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb  and  the 
Blind,  Berkeley,  Cat. 


1884.  26- 

1885.  27- 

1886.  29- 

1887.  25- 

1888.  27- 

1889.  24- 

1890.  43 

1891.  43 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


COLORADO. 

Colorado  School  for  the  Deaf  and  the  Blintl,  Colorado  Springs,  Col. 


1884.  27 

1885.  20 

1886.  34 

1887.  31- 

1888.  22- 

1889.  22 

1890.  36 

1891.  55- 


Taught  Speech.    I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


24 


CONNECTICUT. 

AmeHean  Asylum  for  the  JEducation  and  Instrtiotion  of  the  Deaf  and 

Dumb,  Martford,  Conn. 


1884.  21- 

1885.  23 

1886.  32- 

1887.  47- 

1888.  52 

1889.  57- 

1890.  6 1 

1891.  7 1- 


884.  100 . 

885.  100- 

886.  100- 

887.  lOO- 

888.  100- 

889.  lOO- 

890.  lOO- 

891.  lOO- 


884.  66 

885.  66 

886.  51- 

887.  43 

888.  57- 

889.  51- 

890.  59- 

891.  51- 


1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 


o 

O 
O 
O 
O 

o 

9§ 


Taught  Speech,  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


CONNECTICUT. 

Whipple's  JSome  School  for  the  Deaf,  Mystic,  Conn. 


Taught  Speech.    I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


DISTRICT    OF    COLUMBIA. 

Kendall  School  for  the  Deaf  (Primary  Department  of  the  Columbia 
Institution  for  the  Deaf  and  Dumb),  Washington,  D.C. 


Taught  Speech.    I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


DISTRICT    OF    COLUMBIA. 

National  DeafSIute  College  (Collegiate  Department  of  the  Cttlutuhia 
Institution  for  the  Deaf  and  Dumb),  Washington,  D.C. 


Taught  Speech.    I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


T 


1884.  lOO- 

1885.  loo- 
se. 

\7. 


1884.  — 

1885.  62- 

1886.  62- 

1887.  46- 

1888.  69 

1889.  69- 

1890.  55- 

1891.  87- 


1884.  10 

1885.  8 

1886.  1  O  ■ 

1887.  — 

1888.  4  - 

1889.  3  - 

1890.  3 

1891.  — 


1884.  26 

1885.  26 

1886.  27 

1887.  30 

1888.  29- 

1889.  39- 

1890.  39- 

1891.  46 


25 


DISTRICT    OP    COLUMBIA. 

Mr.  Sell's  Pidvafe  School  for  Deaf  Children,   Washington,  D.C. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


FLORIDA. 
The  Florida  Slind  and  Deaf-Mute  Institute,  St.  A.ugu8tine,  YUi. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


GEORGIA. 

Cfeorgia  Institutiotv  for  the  Education  of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 
Cave  Spring,  Ga. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


ILLINOIS. 

Illinois  Institution  for  the  Edtication  of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 
Jacksonville ,  III. 


Taught  Speech.     I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


'^SSfe^o^ 


1884.   

1885.  22- 

1886.  23- 

1887.  25- 

1888.  25- 

1889.  25- 

1890.  34 

1891.  34 


884.  100. 

885.  100. 

886.  lOO- 

887.  lOO- 

888.  100- 

889.  lOO- 

890.  98- 

891.  97- 


1884. 
1885. 
1886. 

1887.      

1888.  49  •• 

1889.  65- 

1890.  lOO- 

1891.  94.. 


1884.  12 

1885.  16 

1886.  1  5 

1887.  17 

1888.  11 

1889.  23 

1890.  24 

1891.  20 


26 


ILLINOIS. 

Chicago  Deaf- Mute  l>ay  Schools,  Chicago,  HI. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Nox  Taught  Speech. 


ILLINOIS. 

Tlie  McCowen  Oral  School  for  Young  Deaf  Children, 
Englewood  (Chicago),  III. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech, 


ILLINOIS. 
Uphpheta  School  for  the  Deaf,  Chicago,  III. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


INDIANA. 

Indiana  Institution  for  the  Education  of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 

Itidianapolis,  Ind. 


Taught  Speech.     I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889. 
1890 
1891 


17 
O 
O 

o 
o 


1884.  — 

1885.  25- 

1886.  14 

1887.  14- 

1888.  14 

1889.  3 • 

1890.  8 

1891.  8- 


1884 
1885 


1887 


1890 
1891 


1884.  17- 

1885.  22- 

1886.  25  • 

1887.  30 

1888.  19 

1889.  20- 

1890.  15 

1891.  20 


27 


INDIANA. 
Mvansville  Public  School  for  the  Deaf,  Mvansville,  Ind. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


IOWA. 
lotca  Institution  for  the  JEdiMsation  of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 
Council  Bluffs,  Iowa. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


IOWA. 

Eastern  Iowa  School  for  the  Deaf,  Dubuque,  Iowa, 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


KANSAS. 

Kansas  Institution  for  the  Education  of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 
Olathe,  Ran. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


1884. 

11 

1885. 

lO 

1886. 

9 

1887. 

lO 

1888. 

7 

1889. 

10 

1890. 

10 

1891. 

34 

ISU.  —  ■ 

1885.  — 

1886.  — 

1887.  — 


1890.  1  8 

1891.  23- 


1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 


1890 
1891 


28 


KENTUCKY. 
JLentuck%'  Institute  for  Deaf-Mtites,  Damnlle ,  Ky. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


LOUISIANA. 
JLouisiana  School  for  the  Deaf,  JSaton  Rouge,  La. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


LOUISIANA. 
New  Orleans  JPublio  School  for  Deaf -Mutes,  New  Orleans,  Im. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


O 

O 

O 

O 

O 


LOUISIANA. 

Catholic  Institution  for  the  Deaf  and  Duntb , 
Chinohuba,  Mandeville,  £a. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


1885. 


1887. 
1888. 


1891.        O 


1884.  100" 

1885.  100. 

1886.  100- 

1887.  100- 

1888.  100- 

1889.  100. 

1890.  100- 

1891.  100- 


1884. 

63 

1885. 

64 

1886. 

58 

1S87. 

59 

1888. 

58 

1889. 

52 

1890. 
1891. 

51 
50 

1884.  — . 

1885.  — . 

1886.  53- 

1887.  — 

1888.  71- 

1889.  O- 
1«90.  O 


1884.  — 

1885.  — 

1886.  — 

1887.  — 

1888.  lOO. 

1889.  100. 

1890.  — 

1891.  — 


29 


MAINE. 
JPortland  ScJiool  for  the  Deaf,  JPortland,  M«. 


Taught  Speech.         I         Nor  Taught  Bpsboh. 


MARYLAND. 

Maryland  School  for  the  Deaf,  Frederick,  JUd. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


MARYLAND. 

Maryland  School  for  Colored  Blind  and  Deaf,  Baltitnore,  Met. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


MARYLAND. 

JUr.  Knapp'a  Institute,  Baltimore,  Md. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


884.  lOO. 

885.  lOO. 

886.  lOO. 

887.  lOO. 

888.  lOO  . 

889.  lOO. 

890.  lOO. 

891.  lOO. 


884.  lOOi 

885.  lOO- 

886.  lOO . 

887.  lOO . 

888.  100" 

889.  100. 

890.  lOO- 

891.  lOO. 


1884.  45- 

1885.  62- 

1886.  59-- 

1887.  67-- 

1888.  68- 

1889.  62" 

1890.  72- 

1891.  71" 


1884. 
1885. 
1886. 
1887. 

1888.  100. 

1889.  lOO. 

1890.  100 . 

1891.  100. 


30 


MASSACHUSETTS. 

Clarke  Institution  for  Deaf-Mutes,  Northampton,  Mass. 


Taught  Speecu.  I  Not  Taught  Spbech. 


MASSACHUSETTS. 
Morace  Mann  School,  Boston,  JUasB, 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


MASSACHUSETTS. 

New  England  Industrial  School  for  Deaf-Mutes,  Beverly,  Mass, 


Taught  Speech.    I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


MASSACHUSETTS. 

Sarah  Fuller  Mome  for  Little  Children  who  Cannot  Bear, 

West  Medford,  Mass. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


1884.  13- 

1885.  26 

1886.  17- 

1887.  20 

1888.  21- 

1889.  1  7- 

1890.  15- 

1891.  19- 


884.  100- 

885.  lOO- 

886.  100- 
887  100- 
888.  100- 
889    lOO- 

890.  100- 

891.  100- 


884.  22- 

885.  24 

886.  25- 

887.  21- 

888.  39- 

889.  46 

890.  28- 
.  41- 


1884. 

1885. 


1887. 


1889.  lOO- 

1890.  lOO- 

1891.  100- 


31 


MICHIGAN. 

JUiohiga/n  School  for  the  Deaf,  Flint,  Mich. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


MICHIGAN. 

German,  Lxitheran  Deaf  and  Dunth  Institute, 

Xorth  Detroit,  Wayne  Co.,  Mich. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Xot  Taught  Speech. 


MINNESOTA. 

Minnesota  School  for  the  Deaf,  Faribault,  Minn. 


Taught  Speech.    I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


MINNESOTA. 
St.  Mary's  Institute  for  Deaf-Mutes,  St.  Paul,  Minn. 


Taught  Speech.    I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


I 


1884.  28- 

1885.  3a- 

1886.  22- 

1887.  27- 

1888.  23- 

1889.  27- • 

1890.  16 

1891.  16- 


1884.  28 

1885.  23- 

1886.  22 

1887.  25- 

1888.  26- 

1889.  21 

1890.  25- 
1S91.  24- 


1884.   

1885.   

1886.   

1887.  — •• 

1888.  O" 

1889.   

1890.  O" 

1891.  83- 


■:884.  — 

1885.  41- 

1886.  41- 

1887.  —  • 

1888.  —  - 

1889.  — 
1890. 
1891. 


32 


MISSISSIPPI. 

Mississippi  Institution  for  the  Education  of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 

Jackson,  Miss. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Spbech. 


MISSOURI. 

Missouri  School  for  the  Deaf  and  Dumb,  Fulton,  Mo, 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


MISSOURI. 
St.  Iiouis  Day  School  for  the  Deaf,  St.  Zonis,  Mo. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


MISSOURI. 
St.  Joseph's  Deaf-Mute  Institute,  JETannibal,  Mo. 

Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Spbsch. 


1884. 
1885. 


1887. 
1888. 


1890.  lOOi 


1884. 

3.'  43 

1887.  11- 

1888.  25- 

1889.  37' 

1890.  lOO" 

1891.  80- 


1884. 
L885. 
L886. 
1887. 
1888. 
1889. 
1890. 
1891.  100- 


1884.  21  • 

1885.  24 

1886.  22- 

1887.  21  • 

1888.  35- 

1889.  24 

1890.  33 

1891.  36 


33 


MISSOURI. 

JUm8  Parker's  School  for  the  Deaf,  St.  Xiouis,  Mo. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


MISSOURI. 

Mctria  Consilitt  Deaf-Mwte  Institute,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


MISSOURI. 

Sliss  Kugler's  Sehool  for  the  Deaf,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 


Taught  Speech.    I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


NEBRASKA. 
Nehraskfv  Institute  for  the  Deaf  anil  Dumb,  Omaha,  Neb, 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


1884.  28 

1885.  18 

1886.  1  8 

1887.  28 

1888.  — 

1889.  31 

1890.  — 

1891.  32- 


1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 


1891 


1884.  — 

1885.  — 

1886.  — 

1887.  100. 

1888.  lOO- 


1889.  lOO- 

1890.  lOO- 

1891.  98- 


34 


NEW  JERSEY. 
New  Jersey  School  for  the  Deaf,  Trenton,  N.J. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


NEW  MEXICO. 

New  Meaeieo  School  for  the  Deaf  and  Dunih,  Santa  Te,  N.M, 


Taught  Speech.    I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


NEW  YORK. 

New  York  Institution  for  the  Instruction  of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 
New  York,  N.  Y. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


NEW  YORK. 

£e  CouteulaD  St.  Mary's  Institution  for  the  Improved  Instruction  of 

Deaf-Mutes,  Buffalo,  N.Y. 

Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


1884.  56— 

1885.  G1    . 

1886.  67-- 

1887.  63 

1888.  92-- 

1889.  91- 

1890.  92- 

1891.  96  -. 


35 


NEW    YORK. 
Institution  for  the  Improved  Instruction  of  Deaf-Mutes,  New  York,  N.  Y» 


1884.  100- 

1885.  lOO- 
1886  lOO- 

1887.  100- 

1888.  100- 

1889.  100- 

1890.  lOO. 

1891.  100- 


884.  100- 

885.  lOO- 

886.  100- 
7.  70 

888.  lOO- 

889.  100- 

890.  lOO- 

891.  88- 


1884.  —  - 

1885.  91 

1886.  10 

1887.  17- 

1888.  1  2 

1889.  23 

1890.  lOO- 

1891.  92- • 


1884.  80. 

1885.  100- 

1886.  80- 

1887.  82- 

1888.  100- 

1889.  lOO- 

1890.  100- 

1891.  100- 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech, 


NEW  YORK. 

St.  Joseph's  Institute  for  the  Improved  Instruction  of  I>eaf-Mutes, 

Fordham,  N.  Y. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


NEW    YORK. 

Central  New  York  Institution  for  Deaf-Mutes,  Rome,  N.  Y. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


NEW    YORK. 

Western  New  York  Institution  for  Deaf-Mutes,  Rochester,  N.Y, 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


36 


NEW    YORK. 
Northern  Neiv  York  Institution  for  Deaf-Mutes,  Malone,  N.  Y. 


1884.  16- 

1885.  19- 

1886.  23- 

1887.  26- 
L888.  27- 

.  16 

1890.  20 

1891.  29 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


NEW    YORK. 

JUiss  Keeler's  Articulation  Class  for  Deaf-Mutes,  New  York,  N.Y. 


1884. 
1885. 
1886. 

1887.  —  • 

1888.  100« 

1889.  lOO- 

1890.  100- 

1891.  100" 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


NEW    YORK. 

A-lbatty  Monte  School  for  the  Oral  Instruction  of  the  Deaf,  Albany,  N.Y. 


1884. 
1885. 


1887. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


100- 
1890.  lOO- 
100- 


NEW    YORK. 

Warren  Articulation  School  (Private),  243  W.  21st  St.,  New  York  City. 


Taught  Speech.  |  Not  Taught  Speech. 

L884.  

L885.  

1886 

1887.  


1891.  lOO- 


37 


NORTH    CAROLINA. 

North  Carolituz  Institution  for  the  Deaf  and,  Dumb  and  the  Blind, 

Kaleigh,  N.C. 


1884.  — 

ISSo.  20 

1886.  20- 

1887.  12- 

1888.  8- 

1889.  8 

1890.  10 

1891.  8 


o. 

22 


1884.  21-- 

1885.  17 

1886.  —  ■ 

1887.  21- 

1888.  21- 

1889.  24 

1890.  26 

1891.  28- 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


NORTH    DAKOTA. 

School  for  the  Deaf  of  North  Dakota,  Devil's  Lake,  No.  Dak. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


OHIO. 

Ohio  Institution  for  the  Education  of  the  Deaf  and  Dti/tnb, 
Columbus,  Ohio. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


OHIO. 

Cincinnati  Public  School  for  the  Deaf,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 
1 

1884 

Taught  Speech. 

1           Not  Taught  Sfeecu. 

0 

0 

1886 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

0 -   

1 

1884. 
1885. 

L886.  lOO- 
.  lOO- 


L888.  100- 

1889.  lOO- 

1890.  lOO- 

1891.  100. 


1885. 


1884. 
1885. 
1886. 
1887. 
1888. 
1889. 
189U. 
1891. 


1884. 
1885. 
1886. 

1887 
1888. 


1891.  100- 


38 


OHIO. 

Cincinnati  Oral  School  for  the  Deaf,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


OHIO. 

Toledo  Deaf-Mute  School,  Toledo,  Ohio. 


Taught  Speech.    I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


OHIO. 
Cincinnati  Catholic  School  for  Deaf -Mutes ,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


OHIO. 

Notre  Dame  female  School  for  the  Deaf,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Taught  Spbbch.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


39 


OREGON. 

Oregon  School  for  Deaf-Mutea,  Salem,  Ore. 

Taught  Speech.    I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


1884.  O 

1885.  O 

1886.  1 1 

1887.  16 

1888.  29 

1889.  21 

1890.  33- 

1891.  42 


PENNSYLVANIA. 

Pennsylvania.  Institution  for  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 
Philadelphia,  Fenn. 


Taught  Speech.    I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


884.  38- 

885.  30 

886.  31 

887.  28- 

888.  24- 

889.  25- 

890.  24- 

891.  26 


PENNSYLVANIA. 

Western  Pennsylvania  Iivstifution  for  the  Instruction  of  the  Deaf  and 
Dumb,  Hdgeivoodville ,  Penn. 


1884.  14- 

1885.  20 

1886.  15 

1887.  18 

1888.  18 

1889.  1  4 

1890.  15 

1891.  23 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


PENNSYLVANIA. 

Pennsylvania  Oral  School  for  the  Deaf,  Seranton,  Penn. 


884.  100- 

885.  lOO- 

886.  100- 

887.  lOO- 

888.  100- 

889.  100- 

890.  lOO- 

891.  lOO- 


Taught  Speech.     I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


40 


PENNSYLVANIA. 
Miss  Mary  Garrett's  School  for  Deaf  Children,  Philadelphia,  Fenn. 


1884.  lOO- 

1885.  lOO- 


Taught  Speech.    I    ^^"^  Taught  Spbbch. 


1886.  100- 

1887.  100- 
1888. 
1889. 
1890. 
1891. 


.       PENNSYLVANIA. 
Home  for  the  Training  in  Speech  of  Deaf  Children  before  they  are  of 
School  A.ge,  Philadelphia,  Penn. 


887 


Taught  Speech.    I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


891.  lOO- 


RHODE    ISLAND. 

Rhode  Island  School  for  the  Deaf,  Providence,  B.I, 


884.  100- 

885.  94- 

886.  lOO- 

887.  lOO- 

888.  100- 

889.  97-- 

890.  lOO- 

891.  100- 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


SOUTH    CAROLINA. 

South  Carolina  Institution  for  five  Education  of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb 
and  the  Dlind,  Cedar  Spring,  S.C. 


Taught  Speech.  |  Not  Taught  Speech. 

1884.  19 — — 

1885.  1  9 — 

1886.  20 — 

1887.  35 ^— ^^ 

1888.  35 ^^— 

1889.  31 ^-^^ 

1890.  25 — ^ 

1891.  28 — 


1884. 

O 

1885. 

o 

1886. 

10 

1887. 

31 

1888. 

29 

1889. 

31 

1890. 

31 

1891. 

38 

1884.  lO 

1885.  9- 

1886.  7 

1887.  7  • 

1888.  8  • 

1889.  9- 

1890.  10- 

1891.  58- 


1884. 

19 

1885. 

36 

1886. 

1  7 

1887. 
1888. 

21 
19 

1889. 

20 

1890. 

23 

1891. 

22 

41 


SOUTH    DAKOTA. 

Dakota  School  for  Deaf-Mutes,  Siouac  Falls,  So.  Dak. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Spekch. 


TENNESSEE. 
Tennessee  Deaf  and  Dumb  School,  Knoacville,  Tenn. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


TEXAS. 
Texas  Deaf  and  Dutnb  Asylum,  A.ustin,  Tex. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


TEXAS. 
Deaf,  Dumb,  and  Blind  Institution  for  Colored  Youths,  Austin,  Tex. 


Taught  Speech.  |  Not  Taught  Speech. 

1884. 


14 


12 

1891.     12- 


42 


UTAH. 

Utah  School  for  the  Deaf,  Salt  Lake  City,  Utah. 


1884.  — 

1885.  O 

1886.  O 

1887.  O 

1888.  O 

1889.  10 

1890.  O 

1891.  


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Spkecii. 


VIRGINIA. 

Virginia  Institution  for  the  Education  of  the  Deaf  antl  Dumb  and  of  the 
JBlind,  Staunton,  Va . 


1884.  50- 

1885.  37 

1886.  44 

1887.  26- ■ 

1888.  34- 

1889.  23- • 

1890.  22- 

1891.  22" 


1885.  O 

1886.  30- 

1887.  32-- 

1888.  28 

1889.  25- 

1890.  27 

1891.  27 


1884.  O 

1885.  29 

1886.  29 

1887.  — 

1888.  40 

1889.  47 

1890.  55 

1891.  55 


Taught  Speech.     I    Xot  Taught  Speech. 


WASHINGTON. 

Washington  School  fof  Defective  Youth,  Vancouver,  Wash. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


WEST    VIRGINIA. 
West  Virginia  School  for  the  Deaf  and  the  Blind,  Koniney,  W.  V* 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


18S4.  20 

1885.  2& 

1S86.  19- 

1887.  19- 

1888.  18- 

1889.  19- 

1890.  19 

1891.  21 


1884.  lOO- 

1885.  100- 

1886.  lOO- 

1887.  lOO- 

1888.  100- 

1889.  100- 

1890.  lOO- 

1891.  100- 


1S*4. 
1885. 


1887. 
1888.  lOO- 


1889.  lOO- 

1890.  lOO- 

1891.  lOO" 


1S84. 


1887. 
1888. 


1S90.  lOO- 
1891.  lOO- 


43 


WISCONSIN. 

Wiseotmin  School  for  the  Deaf,  Delavan,  Wis. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not.  Taught  Speech. 


WISCONSIN. 
Milwaukee  Day  School  for  the  Deaf,  Milwaukee,  Wis. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


WISCONSIN. 

La  Crosse  Oral  School  for  the  Deaf,  Iia  Crosse,   TVis. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


WISCONSIN. 

Wausau  Day  School  for  the  Deaf,  Wausau,   Wis. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


1884, 
1885 


1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 


1884.  — 

1885.  20 

1886.  37- 

1887.  38 

1888.  36- 

1889.  48 

1890.  65  • 

1891.  61- 


1884. 

1885. 

1886. 

1887. 

1888.  66 

1889. 

1890. 


44 


WISCONSIN. 
Vrentz  School  for  the  Deaf,  Oshkoah,  Wis. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


WISCONSIN. 

St.  John's  Catholic  Deaf-Mute  Institute,  St.  Francis,  Wis. 


Taught  Speech.    |    Not  Taught  Speech. 


BRITISH    COLUMBIA. 

British  Columbia  School  for  Deaf-Mutes,  Victoria,  B.C.,  Canada. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


MANITOBA. 

Manitoha  Institution  for  the  Education  of  the  Iteaf, 
Winnipeg ,  Manitoha,  Canada. 


1884. 

1885. 

1886. 

1887. 

1888. 

40 

1889. 

1890. 

lO 

1891. 

13 

Taught  Speech.    I    Not  Taught  Speech. 


45 


NEW    BRUNSWICK. 
New  Brunstoick  Deaf  and  Dumb  Institution,  Portland,  N.B.,  Canada. 


O 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


NEW    BRUNSWICK. 

Fredericton  Institution  for  the  Education  of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 
Fredericton,  N.B.,  Canada. 


1884.  10 

1885.  — 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


1887 
1888 


1891 


21 


NOVA    SCOTIA. 
Halifax  Institution  for  the  Deaf  and  Dumb,  Halifax,  N.S.,  Canada. 


1884.  18 

1885.  13 

1886.  1  3- 

1887.  — 

1888.  21- 

1889.  32- 

1890.  42- 

1891.  37- 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


ONTARIO. 
Ontario  Institution  for  the  Deaf  and  Dumb,  Belleville,  Ont.,  Canada. 


1884 

11 

1885 

12 

1886 

14 

1887 

15 

1888 

15 

15- 
14 

1890 

1891 

15 

Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


46 


PROVINCE    OF    QUEBEC. 

Catholic  Male  Deaf  and  Dumb  Institution  for  the  Province  of  Quebec, 

Montreal,  JP.Q.,  Canada. 

Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


1884.  40- 

1885.  26- 

1886.  34- 

1887.  37- 

1888.  25- 

1889.  36- 

1890.  49- 

1891.  53- 


884.  36 

885.  32 

886.  34- 

887.  33 

888.  31- 

889.  31- 

890.  45 

891.  37- 


1884. 

17 

1885. 

27 

1886. 

30 

1887. 

36 

1888. 

1889. 

40 

1890. 

52 

1891. 

40 

PROVINCE    OF    QUEBEC. 

Catholic  Female  Deaf-Mute  Institution,  Montreal,  I'.Q.,  Canada. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


PROVINCE    OF    QUEBEC. 

JUaeJeay  Institution  for  Protestant  Deaf-Mutes  and  the  Blind, 
Montreal,  JP.Q.,  Canada. 


Taught  Speech.  I  Not  Taught  Speech. 


THE    FOLLOWING    TABLES    SHOW    THE    FIGURES    UPON 

WHICH    THE    FOREGOING    PERCENTAGES 

HAVE    BEEN    BASED. 


49 


ALABAMA. 


ARKANSAS. 


Alabama  Institute  for  the  Deaf, 

Talladega,  Ala. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

53 
65 
74 
60 
66 
90 
104 
103 

0 
13 
15 
10 

20 
24 
22 

5 
6 
6 
6 

7 
8 
8 
6 

1 
1 
2 
2 
2 
2 

Arkansas  Deaf-Mute  Institute, 

Little  Rock,  Abk. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachkbs. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

73 
91 
112 
122 
132 
131 
140 
152 

23 
64 
37 
34 
32 
30 
28 
34 

6 
6 
7 
8 
8 
9 
9 
10 

CALIFORNIA. 


COLORADO. 


California  Instittttion  for  the  Edu- 
cation of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb 
and  the  Blind, 

Berkeley,  Cal. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

l;i£^\  Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

135 
138 
137 
143 
147 
145 
158 
158 

35 

38 
40 
36 
40 
46 
6S 
6^ 

9 
9 

10 
9 

11 
11 

11 
11 

1 
1 

2 

9 

2 

Colorado  School  for  the  Deaf  and 
the  Blind, 

Colorado  Springs,  Col. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

43 
45 
44 
48 
68 
72 
83 
91 

12 
9 

15 
15 
15 
16 
30 
50 

4 
4 

6 

7 

8 

1 
1 
1 
2 

1 

so 


CONNECTICUT. 


CONNECTICUT. 


American  Asylum  for  the  Education 

and  Instruction  of  the  Deaf 

and    Dumb, 

Hartford,  Conn. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

211 
204 

185 
180 
157 
100 
154 
171 

45 

48 
60 
85 
82 
91 
!)t 
121 

15 
16 
17 
15 
15 
10 
15 
10 

2 

3 
4 
4 
3 
4 

Whvpple's  JEEome  School  fo7'  the 
Deaf, 

Mystic,  Conn. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

12 
12 
17 
20 
18 
25 
23 
28 

12 
12 
17 
20 
18 
25 
23 
28 

2 
2 
4 
4 
4 
3 
3 
4 

~ 
4 
4 
4 
3 
3 
4 

DISTRICT   OF   COLUMBIA. 


DISTRICT  OP  COLUMBIA. 


Kendall  School  for  the  Deaf 

(Primary  Department  of  the  Columbia 
Institution  for  the  Deaf  and  Dumb) 

Washington,  D.C. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

65 
73 
69 

82 
70 
67 
58 
67 

43 
48 
45 
45 
40 
34 
34 
34 

6 
0 
5 
6 
6 
6 
6 
7 

2 

1 
2 
1 
1 
2 

National  Deaf-Mute  College, 

(Collegiate  Department  of  the  Columbia 
Institution  for  the  Deaf  and  Dumb) 

Washington,  D.C. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

54 

48 
59 
60 
68 
65 
71 
66 

0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
63 

9 
9 
9 
9 
9 
9 
9 
19 

0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
10 

SI 


DISTRICT   OP   COLUMBIA. 


FLORIDA. 


Mr.  Bell's  Private  School  for  Deaf 
Children, 

Washington,  D.C. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

5 
6 

5 

6 

2 

3 

The  Florida  Blind  and  Deaf-Mute 
Institute, 

St.  Augustine,  Fla. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

8 
8 

13 
16 
16 
18 
39 

5 
5 

6 
11 
11 
10 
34 

2 
2 
2 
3 
3 
2 
4 

2 
2 

1 
2 

GEORGIA. 


ILLINOIS. 


Georgia  Institution  for  the   Edu- 
cation of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 

Cave  Spring,  Ga. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

103 

90 

98 

90 

88 

103 

103 

103 

10 

7 
10 

4 
3 
3 

6 

7 
7 

7 
7 
7 
7 
8 

0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
1 

Illinois  Institution  for  the  Educa- 
tion of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 

Jacksonville,  III. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
latioD. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

580 
684 
563 
564 
588 
560 
572 
595 

150 
150 
150 
170 
170 
217 
225 
275 

31 
31 
31 
32 
32 
33 
34 
35 

o 
5 
5 
6 
6 
8 

52 


ILLINOIS. 


ILLINOIS. 


Chicago  Deaf- Mute  Day  Schools, 

Chicago,  III. 

i 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 

57 

- 

6 

- 

1885 

45 

10 

6 

- 

1886 

47 

11 

6 

1 

1887 

48 

12 

6     !       2 

1888 

48 

12 

6 

2 

1889 

48 

12     i       6 

2 

1890 

35 

12            6 

1 

1891 

35 

12            6 

1 

The  McCoiven  Oral  School  for 
Young  Deaf  Children, 

Englewoob  (Chicago),  III. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
latioD. 

7 
5 
5 
5 
5 
;       8 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

20 
23 
30 
27 
25 
25 
25 
32 

20 
23 
30 
27 
25 
25 
24 
31 

3 
5 

7 
6 
5 
5 

6 

8 

ILLINOIS. 


INDIANA. 


Ephpheta  School  for  the  Deaf, 

Chicago,  III. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 

1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

47 
46 
58 
75 

23 
30 

58 
70 

4 
4 
4 
6 

1 
3 
3 
4 

Indiana  Institution  for  the  Edxi- 
cation  of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

374 
374 
372 
352 
347 
348 
355 
342 

45 
60 
58 
60 
40 
80 
84 
68 

18 
18 
20 
20 
19 
19 
17 
21 

1 

1 
1 
2 

1 
1 

53 


INDIANA. 


IOWA. 


Evansville  Public  School  for  the 
Deaf, 

EVANSVILLE,   IND. 

Date. 

Pupils, 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

23 
25 
25 
24 

30 

28 

4 

0 
0 

0 

_ 

2 
2 
2 
2 
2 
2 

0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 

Iowa  Institution  for  the  Educa- 
tion of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 

Council  Bluffs,  Iowa. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

290 
285 
292 
309 
309 
331 
309 
309 

70 
42 
44 
44 
10 
25 
25 

19 
15 
15 
18 
18 
18 
18 
18 

1 
1 
I 
2 

IOWA. 


KANSAS. 


Eastern  Iowa  School  for  the 
Deaf, 

Dubuque,  Iowa. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

IG 

15 
5 

0 

0 
0 

1 

1 
1 

0 

0 
0 

Kansas  Institution  for  the  Educa- 
tion of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 

Olathe,  Kan. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

191 
225 
239 
235 
253 
266 
264 
270 

32 
50 
60 
70 
49 
55 
40 
54 

11 
14 
14 
17 
17 
17 
18 
18 

1 
2 

1 
1 
1 
1 

54 


KENTUCKY. 


LOUISIANA. 


Kentuehy  Institute  for  Deaf-Mutes, 

Danville,  Ky. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

152 

161 
190 
194 
179 
201 
218 
237 

17 
16 
18 
20 
12 
22 
23 
81 

11 
12 
12 
13 
13 
14 
14 
16 

2 

Louisiana  School  for  the  Deaf, 

Baton  Rouge,  La. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

43 

_ 

79 
127 

14 
29 

4 

5 
5 

1 

LOUISIANA. 


LOUISIANA. 


New  Orleans  Public  School  for 
Deaf-Mutes, 

New  Orleans,  La. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

16 
9 

10 
8 
8 

0 

0 
0 
0 

0 
0 
0 
0 
0 

Catholic  Institution  for  the  Deaf 
and  Dumb, 

Chinchuba,  Mandeville,  La. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

8 

0 

6 

0 

55 


MAINE. 


MARYLAND. 


Portland  School  for  the  Deaf, 

Portland,  Me. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teacheks. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

45 
46 
53 
53 
58 
50 
60 
51 

45 
46 
bd 
53 
53 
50 
50 
51 

5 

5 
6 
6 
6 
6 
6 
6 

6 
0 
G 
6 
6 
6 

Maryland  School  for  the  Deaf, 

Frederick,  Md. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
188^1 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

112 
110 
112 
114 
114 
105 
lOG 
107 

71 
70 
65 
67 
66 
55 
54 
54 

10 
10 
10 
10 
10 
10 
10 
10 

2 
2 

2 
2 
2 

2 

MARYLAND. 


MARYLAND. 


Matnfland  School  for  Colored  Blind 
and  Deaf, 

Baltimore,  Md. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

20 
19 
17 

24 
23 
22 

18 

9 

17 
0 
0 

2 

2 
3 

3 
2 
6 

4 

1 
0 
0 

0 

*  Mr.  Knapp's  Institute, 

Baltimore,  Md. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

28 
28 

28 
28 

4 
4 

_ 

4 
4 

56 


MASSACHUSETTS. 


MASSACHUSETTS. 


Clarke  Institution  for  Deaf- Mutes, 

Northampton,  Mass. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

Ill 
106 
104 
108 
117 
123 
121 
128 

Ill 
106 
104 
108 
117 
123 
.2, 
128 

13 
13 
13 

13 
14 
14 
14 
14 
14 

Horace  Mann  School, 

Boston,  Mass. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

92 

91 
87 
87 
89 
97 
97 
103 

92 
91 
87 
87 
89 
97 
97 
103 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

10 

10 

11 

9 
9 
9 

10 
10 
11 

MASSACHUSETTS. 


MASSACHUSETTS. 


Xew  JEngland  Industrial  School  for 
Deaf-Mutes, 

Beverly,  Mass. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

SS.    -I'otal. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

20 
21 
22 
24 
22 
32 
32 
28 

9 
13 
13 
16 
14 
20 
23 
20 

2 
2 
3 
2 

3 
3 
3 
2 

Sarah  Fuller  Some  for  Little 
Children  who  Cannot  Hear, 

West  Medford,  Mass. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

12 
13  . 
11 
13 

12 
13 
11 
13 

1 
3 
4 
4 

1 
3 
1 
4 

57 


MICHIGAN. 


MICHIGAN. 


Michigan  School  for  the  Deaf, 

Flint,  Mich, 

1         Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Date. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 

310 

41 

16 

- 

1885 

321 

85 

18 

- 

1886 

334 

61 

18 

1 

1887 

297 

60          18 

1 

1888 

333 

70          19 

1 

1889 

347 

60          19 

2 

1890 

338 

50     1     18 

1 

1891 

345 

65          19 

2 

German  Lutheran  Deaf  and  Dumb 
Institute, 

North  Detroit,  Wayne  Co.,  Mich. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

40 
40 
36 
37 
39 
47 
44 
50 

40 
40 
36 
37 
39 
47 
44 
50 

3 
3 
3 
3 
3 
3 
3 
3 

3 
3 
3 
3 
3 
3 

MINNESOTA. 


MINNESOTA. 


Minnesota  School  for  the  Deaf, 

Faribault,  Minn. 

Date. 

Ptjpils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation . 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

148 
164 
157 
165 
174 
189 
231 
242 

'33 
40 
40 
34 
68 
87 
65 

100 

10 
11 
9 
10 
10 
10 
11 
12 

1 
2 
2 
2 
2 
2 

St.  Mary's  Institute  for  Deaf-Mu4es, 

St.  Paul,  Minn. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

1 
Teachers,    i 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu 
lation . 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

37 
38 
47 

37 
34 
40 

2 
3 
4 

2 
3 
4 

58 


MISSISSIPPI. 


MISSOURI. 


Mississippi  Institution,  for  the  JSd^ii- 
cation  of  the  Deaf  and  Dtinib, 

Jackson,  Miss. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

88 
100 
90 
91 
85 
90 
99 
93 

25 
30 
20 
25 
30 
24 
16 
15 

6 
6 

7 
7 
7 
7 
8 
7 

" 

Missouri  School  foi 

the  Deaf 

and  Dumb 

> 

Fulton,  Mo. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Date. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Artiou- 
lation. 

1884 

248 

70 

13 

_ 

1885 

261 

60 

13 

- 

1886 

240 

53 

13 

2 

1887 

259 

64 

13     1       2 

1888 

281 

73 

13     i       2 

1889 

297 

63 

16     1       2 

1890 

327 

83 

18 

2 

1891 

336 

80 

18 

2 

MISSOURI. 


MISSOURI. 


St.  Louis  Day- School  for  the  Deaf, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

46 
45 
54 
53 
47 
42 
34 
42 

0 

0 
35 

3 
3 
3 
3 
3 
2 
2 
3 

0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
1 

St.  Joseph's  Deaf-Mute  Institute, 

Hannibal,  Mo. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

21 
22 
22 

9 
9 

3 

1 
1 

- 

59 


MISSOURI. 


MISSOURI. 


Miss  Parker's  School  for  the  Deaf, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

10 

,0 

1 

1 

Maria  Consilia  Deaf-Mute  Institute, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Tbachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

23 
26 
32 
30 
37 
45 

10 
3 
8 
11 
37 
36 

3 
3 
3 
3 
5 
4 

3 

MISSOURI. 


NEBRASKA. 


Miss  Kugler's  School  for  the  Deaf, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

5 

5 

1 

1 

Nebraska  Institute  for  the  Deaf 
and  Dumb, 

Omaha,  Neb. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 

129 

27 

8 

- 

1885 

123 

30 

9 

- 

1886 

118 

26 

8 

2 

1887 

121 

25 

0 

2 

1888 

139 

48 

1) 

2 

1889 

129 

31 

0 

2 

1890 

142 

47 

!    10 

4 

1891 

151 

55 

i    u 

4 

6o 


NEW  JERSEY. 


NEW  MEXICO. 


New  Jersey  School  for  the  lienf, 

Tkenton,  N.J. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teacheks. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

110 
119 
119 
117 
116 
117 
134 
138 

31 
22 
22 
33 

37 

45 

7 

7 
7 

0 
8 
9 
9 

2 

0 
2 
1 
4 

Xew  Mexico  School  for  the  Deaf 

and  Dumb, 

Santa  Fe,  N.M. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Art.cu- 
latioD. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

5 
5 

8 
8 
9 

7 

0 
0 
0 
0 
0 

0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 

NEW  YORK. 


NEW  YORK. 


New  TorJc  Institution  for  the  In- 
struction of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 

New  York,  N.Y. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Se^efh.    Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 

1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

419 
414 
413 
391 
377 
365 
350 
342 

391 
377 
365 
350 
335 

16 
16 
15 
17 
18 
14 
15 
16 

8 
8 
8 
8 

ie  Coufeulx  St.  Mart/'s  Institution 
for  the  Improved  Instruction 

of  Deaf-MuteSf                         | 
Buffalo,  N".Y. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers.     : 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu. 
lution. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

160 
150 
150 
158 
157 
164 
158 
141 

90 
100 
100 
100 
145 
150 
145 
136 

11 
11 
11 
12 
12 
12 
12 
12 

4 
10 
10 
10 

11 

6i 


NEW  YORK. 


NEW  YORK. 


Jnsfitnfion  for  the  Itnjiroveil  In- 
struction of  JDeaf-Mutes, 
New  York,  N.Y. 

Datk. 

Pupils.        1      Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught  1  ^^, 
Speech.    ■^°'^'* 

i 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1800 
1891 

184 
182 
198 
194 
207 
213 
214 
223 

184 
182 
198 
194 
207 
213 
214 
223 

15 
15 
15 
15 
19 
15 
20 
21 

15 
15 
14 
15 
20 
21 

St.  Joseph's  Institute  for  the  Im- 
proved Instrnction  of  neaf- Mutes, 

FORDHAM,  N.Y. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation, 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

262 
271 
271 
297 
314 
296 
311 
347 

262 
271 
271 
209 
314 
296 
311 
304 

20 
19 
19 
21 
20 
21 
21 

24 

1 

21 
19 
20 
20 
24 

NEW  YORK. 


NEW  YORK. 


Central  Xew  York  Institution  for 

Deaf- Mutes, 

Rome,  X.Y. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total.    |-t^. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

2 

1 
1 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

166 
164 
170 
165 
170 
160 
156 
162 

15 
18 
28 
20 
37 
156 
150 

12 
12 
12 
13 
12 
12 
10 
11 

Western  Netv  York  Institution  for 

Deaf- Mutes, 

Rochester,  N.Y. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

175 
179 
188 
190 
176 
166 
171 
167 

140 
179 
150 
156 
176 
166 
171 
167 

14 
14 
14 
20 
19 
19 
15 
15 

7 
8 
8 
5 
5 
5 

62 


NEW  YORK. 


NEW  YORK. 


Northern  New  Torh  Institution  for 
Deaf-Mutes, 
Malone,  N.Y. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

25 
37 
56 
69 
74 
74 
89 
95 

4 
7 
13 
18 
20 
12 
18 
28 

3 
4 
5 

6 
6 
6 

7 

Miss  Keeler's  A.rticulation  Class  for 

JDeaf- Mutes, 

I5-EW  York,  N.Y. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

11 
12 
12 
11 

11 
12 
12 
11 

- 
2 
2 
2 

2 

2 
2 
2 
2 

NEW  YORK. 


NEW  YORK. 


Albany  Home  School  for  the  Oral 
Instruction  of  the  Deaf, 

Albany,  N.Y. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

3 

7 
10 

3 

7 

10 

1 
2 
2 

1 
2 
2 

Warre^i  Articulation  School, 

(Private) 
243  W.  21sT  St.,  New  York  City. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

16 

15 

4 

4 



63 


NORTH  CAROLINA. 


NORTH  DAKOTA. 


Xorth  Carolina  Institution  for  the 
Deaf  and  Dumb  and  the  JUlind, 

Raleigh,  N.C. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

114 
125 
125 
127 
137 
137 
132 
149 

25 
25 
15 
12 
12 
14 
12 

10 

8 

8 
8 
8 
8 
9 

- 

School  for  the  Deaf  of  North  DaTiota, 

Devil's  Lake,  No.  Dak. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Tbachebs. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu-' 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

17 
36 

0 

8 

2 
3 

0 

1 

OHIO. 


OHIO. 


Ohio  Institution  for  the  Education 
of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 

Columbus,  Ohio. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

476 
458 
447 
470 
472 
495 
471 
451 

100 
80 

100 
100 
120 
122 
125 

26 
26 
26 
24 
26 
27 
25 
26 

2 
2 
2 
3 
2 
2 

Cincinnati  Public  School  for  the 
Deaf, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

36 
36 
39 
35 
21 
13 
13 
11 

0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 

2 
2 
2 

2 
2 

1 
1 
1 

0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 

64 


OHIO. 


OHIO. 


Cincinnati  Oral  School  for  the  Deaf, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taug\it 
Speech. 

-total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

7 
16 
18 
20 
20 
30 

•7 
16 
18 
20 
20 
30 

2 
2 
2 
2 

3 
4 

2 

2 
2 
2 

4 

Toledo  Deaf-Mute  School, 

Toledo,  Ohio. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
,  1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

17 
17 

0 

1 

1 

0 
0 

OHIO. 


OHIO. 


Cincinnati  Catholic  School  for 
Deaf-Mutes, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total, 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
ls9l 

25 
20 
20 

~ 

2 
2 
2 

1        1        1        1 

Xotre  Itante  Female  School  for  the 
Deaf, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Datk. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

8 

8 

2 

2 

6s 


OREGON. 


PENNSYLVANIA. 


Oregon  School  for  Deaf-Mutes, 

Salem,  Ore. 

Date. 

i        Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

29 
29 
28 
31 
31 
34 
30 
43 

0 
0 
3 
5 

9 

7 

10 

18 

3 
3 
3 
3 
3 
3 
4 
3 

0 

1 
1 
1 
1 

Pennsylvania  Institution  for  the 
Deaf  find  Dumb, 

Philadelphia,  Penn. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

447 
466 
502 
504 
494 
478 
494 
490 

172 
143 
155 
140 
120 
120 
118 
130 

33 
34 

36 
36 
37 
37 

37 

38 

14 
13 
13 
13 
13 
14 

PENNSYLVANIA. 


PENNSYLVANIA. 


Western  Pennsylvania  Institution 

for  the  Instruction  of  the 

Deaf  and  Dumb, 

Edgewoodville,  Penn. 

'                  1         Pupils. 

D  VTE 

Teachers. 

Total. 

SS^.i  Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884  1  124 

1885  145 

1886  174 

1887  178 

1888  180 

1889  197 

1890  194 

1891  \  211 

17 
29 
27 
33 
33 
28 
30 
50 

8 
9 
11 
12 
11 
11 
12 
13 

2 

Pennsylvania  Oral  School  for  the 
Deaf, 

Scranton,  Penn. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
ir^91 

20 
18 
18 
24 
36 
42 
53 
53 

20 
18 
18 
24 
36 
42 
53 
53 

2 

1 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
5 

1 
2 

3 
4 
5 
5 

66 


PENNSYLVANIA. 


PENNSYLVANIA. 


Mi8s  MaTy  Garrett's  School  for 
Deaf  Children, 

Philadelphia,  Penn. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

8 
12 
16 
15 

8 

12 
16 
15 

1 
2 
2 
2 

2 
2 
2 

Some  for  the  Training  in  Speech 

of  Deaf  Children  before  they  are 

of  School  Age. 

Philadelphia,  Penn. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

20 

20 

RHODE  ISLAND. 


SOUTH  CAROLINA. 


Jthode  Island  School  for  the  Deaf, 

Providence,  R.I. 

Date. 

P(IPIL.S. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
liition. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

29 
32 
32 
36 
33 
31 
41 
42 

29 
30 
32 
36 
33 
30 
41 
42 

3 
4 
4 
5 
5 
5 

i    ^ 

4 
5 
5 
5 

5 

South  Carolina  Institution  for  the 

Education  of  the  Deaf  and  numb 

and  the  Blind, 

Cedar  Spring,  S.C. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

lp\"e?h*.|  Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

59 
67 
74 
72 
81 
74 
81 
91 

11 
13 
15 
25 
28 
23 
20 
26 

5 

4 
4 

a 

6 
7 

7 

1 

2 
2 
2 
2 
2 

67 


SOUTH  DAKOTA. 


TENNESSEE. 


Dakota  School  for  Deaf- Mutes, 

Sioux  Falls,  So.  Dak. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

33 
36 
40 
45 
44 
61 
51 
47 

0 
0 

4 
14 
13 
16 
16 
18 

2 
2 
3 
5 
5 
5 
6 
4 

1 
2 

1 

1 
1 

Tennessee  Deaf  and  Dumb  School, 

Kkoxville,  Tenn. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

153 

148 
150 
151 
164 
187 
191 
188 

15 
13 
10 
11 
13 
16 
20 
110 

7 
8 
8 
8 
8 
9 

9 

TEXAS. 


TEXAS. 


Texaa  Deaf  and  Dumb  Asylum, 

Austin,  Tex. 

Datk. 

Pupils. 

Tbachbrs. 

ToUl. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

129 
146 
148 
168 
174 
195 
212 
229 

25 
33 
25 

34 
34 
39 
49 
50 

10 
9 
10 
10 
12 
11 
13 
13 

Deaf,  Dumb,  and  Blind  Institution 
for  Colored  Youths, 

Austin,  Tex. 

Dati. 

Pupils. 

Teachxrs. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1886 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

28 
36 
40 
39 

6 

6 
5 

3 

3 
3 

1 

1 
0 

68 


UTAH. 


VIRGINIA. 


Vtnh  School  for  the  Jieaf, 

Salt  Lake  City,  Utah. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total, 

Articu- 
lutiou. 

1884 
1885 
188G 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

20 
20 
20 
35 
38 
43 
48 

0 
0 
0 
0 
4 

0 

1 
2 
2 
2 

3 
3 
4 

0 
0 
0 

1 

0 

1 

Virginia  Institution  for  tlie  Edu- 
cation of  the  Deaf  and  JJunih 
and  of  the  lilind, 

Staunton,  Va. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachebs. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
188G 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

07 

98 

96 

96 

102 

106 

113 

113 

40 
36 

42 
25 
35 
25 
25 
25 

12 
11 
12 
12 
11 
10 
11 
11 

WASHINGTON. 


WEST  VIRGINIA. 


Washington  School  for  Defective 
Youth, 

Vancouver,  Wash. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1S91 

9 
20 
22 
25 
32 
33 
55 

0 
6 
7 
7 
8 
9 
15 

2 

3 
3 
3 
3 
3 
4 

1 
1 
1 
1 
2 
2 

West  Virginia  School  for  the  Deaf 

and  the  Blind, 

RoMNEY,  W.  Va. 

Date. 

Pupils.        !      Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 

75 

0 

,5 

- 

1885 

J     76 

22      I        6 

~ 

1886 

79 

23 

6 

1887 

68 

- 

6 

1888 

62 

25            6 

1889 

82 

39            6 

1890 

88          48     !       6 

1891 

01 

50 

7 

69 


WISCONSIN. 


WISCONSIN. 


Wisconsin  School  for  the  Deaf, 

Delavan,  Wis. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

242 
231 
236 
249 
259 
226 
223 
210 

48 
61 
45 
48 
48 
44 
43 
45 

14 
14 
14 
15 
15 
15 
15 
16 

3 
3 
3 
3 
3 
3 

MUtvaukee  Day  School  for  the  Deaf, 
Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

11 
25 
35 
37 
43 
44 
49 
39 

11 
25 
35 
37 
43 
44 
49 
39 

2 
3 
4 
6 
5 
6 
6 
6 

3 
6 
o 
6 
5 
6 

WISCONSIN. 


WISCONSIN. 


JLa  Crosse  Oral  School  for  the  Deaf, 
La  Crosse,  Wis. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teach  i;  us. 

■'■<"'■'■  ;s^^ 

-^'•'"'•itur; 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

5 

8 
9 

5 

7 
8 
<> 

1 

1 

] 

1 
1 
1 
1 

Wausau  Day  School  for  the  Deaf, 
Wausau,  Wis. 

Date. 

1 
Pupils.              Teachers. 

Total. 

ge^efh.    Tot-^- 

Articu- 
lation. 

1 

1 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

8 
6 

8 
6 

1 
1 

70 


WISCONSIN. 


WISCONSIN. 


3^'entz  School  for  the  Deaf, 

OsHKOSH,  "Wis. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total.  |J'-1'. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891    ' 

7 

0 

1 

0 

St.  John's  Catholic  Deaf-Mute 
Institute, 

St.  Francis,  Wis. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

45 
45 
27 

21 
28 
27 
29 

:38 

9 
10 

8 

10 
13 
19 
23 

3 
3 
3 
3 
3 
3 
4 
4 

1 
2 
2 
2 
2 
2 

BRITISH  COLUMBIA. 


MANITOBA. 


British  Columbia  School  for 

JDeaf-Mtites, 

Victoria,  B.C.,  Canada. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

6 

4 

1 

0 

Manitoba  Institution  for  the  Mdu- 
cation  of  the  Heaf, 

Winnipeg,  Manitoba,  Canada. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

10 
19 
30 
39 

4 

3 
5 

1 
1 
3 
4 

1 
0 

1 

1 

71 


NEW  BRUNSWICK. 


NEW  BRUNSWICK. 


Xetv  Brunswick  Deaf  and  Dumb 
Institution, 

Portland,  N.B.,  Canada. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

32 

0 

2 

- 

Fredericton  Institution  for  the  Ed- 
ucation of  the  Deaf  and  Dumb, 

Fredericton,  N.B.,  Canada. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

20 
17 

24 

23 
27 

2 

5 

2 
2 

2 
2 

3 

3 

4 

0 
0 

NOVA  SCOTIA. 


ONTARIO. 


Halifax  Institution  for  the  Deaf 
and  Dumb, 

Halifax,  N.S.,  Canada. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

73 
74 
78 
75 
72 
72 
74 
72 

13 
10 
10 

15 
23 
31 
27 

4 
5 
5 
5 
5 
5 
6 
6 

0 
1 
2 

1 

1 

Ontario  Institution  for  the  Deaf 
and  Dumb, 

Belleville,  Ont.,  Canada. 

Date. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation, 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

286 
284 
273 
264 
265 
274 
291 
296 

32 
33 
37 
39 

38 
40 
42 
43 

15 
15 
15 
15 
15 
15 
16 
15 

72 


PROVINCE  OF  QUEBEC. 


PROVINCE  OP  QUEBEC. 


Catholic  Male  Deaf  and  Dumb 

Institution  for  the  Jfrovince 

of  Quebec, 

Montreal,  P.Q.,  Canada. 

Date. 

PapiLs. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

126 
117 
105 
107 
103 
112 
120 
113 

50 
30 
36 
40 
26 
40 
59 
60 

25 
27 

28 
28 
33 
32 
30 
30 

- 
5 
5 
5 

28 
7 

Catholic  Female  Deaf- Mute 
Institution, 

Montreal,  P.Q.,  Canada. 

Date. 

PUI'ILS. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 

165 
185 
230 
228 
209 
209 
165 
196 

59 
60 

78 
75 
66 
66 

78 
72 

35 
35 
44 
39 
44 
44 
36 
38 

12 
10 

10 
10 
15 
15 

PROVINCE  OF  QUEBEC. 


Mackaij  Institution  for  Protestant 
Deaf- Mutes  and  the  Blind, 

Montreal,  P.Q.,  Canada. 

Pupils. 

Teachers. 

Total. 

Taught 
Speech. 

Total. 

Articu- 
lation. 

1884         45 

8 

- 

1885         45 

12 

- 

1886 

46 

14 

2 

1887 

50 

18 

2 

1888 

46 

- 

2 

1889 

40 

16 

2 

1890 

48 

25 

5 

3 

1891 

50 

20 

5 

3 

American  Association  to  Promote  the  Teaching 
OF  Speech  to  the  Deaf. 


OFFICERS  OF  THE   ASSOCIATION. 

Preside7it. 
ALEXANDER  GRAHAM  BELL. 

Vice-Presidents. 
GARDINER  G.   HUBBARD,  CAROLINE  A.   YALE. 

Secretary. 
Z.   F.   WESTERVELT, 

945  N.  St.  Paul  Street,  Rochester,  N.Y. 

Secretary  pro  tern. 

F.   W.   BOOTH, 

Cor.  Broad  and  Pine  Streets,  Philadelphia,  Penn. 

Corresponding-  Secretary. 

MARY  H.   TRUE, 

945  N.  St.  Paul  Street,  Rochester,  N.Y. 

Treasurer. 

CHARLES  J.   BELL,  Banker, 

Washington,  D.C. 

Board  of  Directors. 

Ellen  L.  Barton, 

Principal  of  Day-School  for  the  Deaf,  Portland,  Me. 

Philip  G.  Gillett, 
Principal  of  Illinois  Institution  for  the  Deaf,  Jacksonville,  111. 

Z.  F.  Westervelt, 

Principal  of  Western  N.Y.  Institution  for  the  Deaf,  Rochester,  N.Y. 

Terms  expire  1893. 

Alexander  Graham  Bell, 
133 1, Connecticut  Avenue,  Washington,  D.C. 

Gardiner  G.  Hubbard, 
1328  Connecticut  Avenue,  Washington,  D.C. 

A.  L.  E.  Crouter, 
Principal  of  Pennsylvania  Institution  for  the  Deaf,  Philadelphia,  Penn. 

Terms  expire  1S94. 

L.  S.  Fechheimer, 
141  Race  Street,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

David  Greenberger, 

Principal  of  Institution  for  Improved  Instruction  of  the  Deaf, 

904  Lexington  Avenue,  New  York,  N.Y. 

Caroline  A.  Yale, 

Principal  of  Clarke  Institution  for  the  Deaf,  Northampton,  Mass. 

Terms  expire  1895. 

Executive  Committee. 
Alexander  Graham  Bell,  Gardiner  G.  Hubbard, 

Caroline  A.  Yale,  A.  L.  E.  Crouter, 

David  Greenberger,  Z.  F.  Westervelt. 


THIS  BOOK  IS  DUE  ON  THE  LAST  DATE 
STAMPED  BELOW 


AN  INITIAL  FINE  OF  25  CENTS 

WILL  BE  ASSESSED  FOR  FAILURE  TO  RETURN 
THIS  BOOK  ON  THE  DATE  DUE.  THE  PENALTY 
WILL  INCREASE  TO  SO  CENTS  ON  THE  FOURTH 
DAY  AND  TO  $1.00  ON  THE  SEVENTH  DAY 
OVERDUE. 


■■^- »'r  ',4,^y 


SEP  26  1966  33 


RECEIVED 


NOV  20 1941 M 


SEP  2  4 '66 -1PM 


fm  16  f  6^^ 


LOAN  DEPT. 


DbO  161940       <M/?gO;j)^^^ 


3 


3. 


lf<: 


m(>  f^-^^ 


RyffKf 


u> 


dX-^ 


rt-tl 


.*:"-<-fr:  \y  foa! 


cri 


B^BLD    M<'7-71-2PM49 


^4^ 


s'64r»' 


REcn  LP 


*J/lNl7'64-llRffl 


LD  21-100m-7,'40 (6936s) 


/fi>  "y 


THE  UNIVERSITY  OF  CALIFORNIA  LIBRARY 


